Dear Alejandra and all

 

I agree with what was suggested before

 

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Alejandra Reynoso via Ccnso-council
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 9:38 PM
To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] [Request for Advice] ALAC session at ICANN 71

 

Dear All

As usual the MPC met one day after the conclusion of the ICANN meeting to review what went well, what can be improved and how to prepare for the next ICANN meeting from a ccNSO perspective.

One of the items discussed was the "At-Large Policy Session 2: ccTLD Governance Models - Testimonies From At-Large End Users" (https://go.icann.org/3w8Mqxg)

Several comments were made, including:

The general feelings of those attending the MPC meeting was that the session was of low quality due to lack of preparation, and some argued that in hindsight we [the ccNSO] shouldn't have participated as they felt that by participating the ccNSO gave credence to the session.

This is a small sample of comments, but I can see how others from our community might be just as confused and upset as a result of the session. Therefore, how do you propose we proceed with this matter? Should I write to the ALAC Chair? If so, what should be the goal and content of the message? Do nothing? Do you have another suggestion?

Please advise, preferably by Monday 5 of July.

Best regards,
Alejandra

 

--

 

Рисунок удален отправителем. Photograph

 

 

Alejandra Reynoso
Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt

 

P: +502 23688565
E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt

 

18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109)
Guatemala, Guatemala

 

www.gt