Dear Hiro,
Theintention of the charter was that your concern was captured in the scope section:
“1. Defining the relevant elements of the following mechanisms:
....
Subsection c. the qualification of incidents and associated escalation procedures.
...”
Would address your concern?
Kind regards,
Bart
On 7/15/09 1:10 PM, "HiroHOTTA" <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
Thank you, Bart.
It's pretty much comprehensive.
If I could pose a comment,
I think it's important to pre-define the scope of "what kind of
events are defined as incidents." For examaple, could a huge
spamming be an incident we consider? Could a whole DNS failure
of a single ccTLD, which may impact all the domain names
having NameServers under the ccTLD, be an incident we consider?
So, how about adding an item
Defining the kinds of incidents that the mechanism covers.
to B. Scope of activities
Hiro
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:06:10 -0700
Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote:
> Dear Chris,
> Included is the draft charter for the Emergency Response Planning Working Group for adoption by the Council. If the Council could take a vote before the end of next week, it would be great,
> Kind regards,
> Bart