I
have one lingering concern about this document. Karklins' comments are
about "geographic names," which would seem to me to include city names.
Our comments are entitled "geographical names" but address country names
only. I am very comfortable with the ccnso comments on country
names. I am concerned that our comments could be interpreted to
apply to city and regional names as well, however.
In the past, the GAC took the position that city names should have the
support of the relevant city, which seems quite sensible. But to my
knowledge we haven't taken the view that city/regional names should be exempt
from ICANN rules.
To avoid any confusion, can we call this paper: Geographical Names – Input from ccNSO Council on Country/Territory
Names.
And, can we add a sentence
somewhere that says: "These comments are limited to the use of country/territory
names in top level domains, but are not intended to address the use of city or
regional names."
B
J. Beckwith Burr | WilmerHale
1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20006 USA
+1 202 663 6695 (t)
+1 202 663 6363 (f)
becky.burr@wilmerhale.com
Please
consider the environment before printing this email.
This email message and any attachments
are being sent by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential,
and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
immediately—by replying to this message or by sending an email to postmaster@wilmerhale.com—and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments. Thank you.
All,
As discussed in
Sydney, attached is the proposed input to ICANN on this topic. It is based on
the note drafted by Hilde and Annebeth. Please provide any input or comment as
soon as possible.
Cheers,
Chris
Disspain
CEO - auDA
au Domain
Administration Ltd
ceo@auda.org.au
www.auda.org.au
Important Notice -
This email may
contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and
is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you
have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this
email.
__________ Information
from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4206 (20090701)
__________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com