+ 1.

 

Best,

 

Giovanni

 

 

Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager

 

Phone: +32 (0)2 401 27 50

Mobile: +39 335 8141733

Website: www.eurid.eu

Address: Woluwelaan 150 - 1831 Diegem - Belgium

                     

        

 

 

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Margarita Valdés
Sent: 08 April 2019 17:21
To: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Should blogs ask for community feedback?

 

+1, and I have the same question, do we have a plan B to response?

Regards

M.-

Margarita Valdés Cortés, MBM - UAI

Attorney - Legal and Business Manager

NIC Chile - Faculty of Physical and Mathematical Sciences

University of Chile

www.nic.cl

Tel: +56229407734

El 08-04-19 a las 11:10, Nick Wenban-Smith escribió:

Hi Katrina

 

Agreed. It’s very strange to launch this via a blog.

 

I have suggested a little more background in the letter (effectively what you put in your email explaining the issue).

 

Assuming they don’t reissue the questions and a response is therefore due by 15 April, do we need to have a plan to get a response in?

 

Best

Nick

 

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Jordan Carter
Sent: 07 April 2019 21:27
To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>
Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Should blogs ask for community feedback?

 

Dear Katrina

 

This looks like a good issue to raise and I think that the draft letter does that effectively. Thank you!

 

Cheers

Jordan 

 

On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 06:02, Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

As we learnt, on 9 March, right before the official start of the ICANN week, in his blog post Göran issued a “call to action” (see: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/independent-review-process-standing-panel-call-to-action) asking for community input on a set of questions about the selection and qualification of standing panellists that need to be selected to the Standing Panel to review disputes under Independent Review Process. Deadline for submitting comments is 15 April.

Why is it important for ccTLDs: although the disputes exclude “Claims relating to ccTLD delegations and re-delegations;”, they cover, e.g. “[disputes that] arose from claims involving rights of the EC as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws”, “Claims that ICANN, the Board, individual Directors, Officers or Staff members have not enforced ICANN's contractual rights with respect to the IANA Naming Function Contract” or “Claims regarding PTI service complaints by direct customers of the IANA naming functions that are not resolved through mediation”.

I think we all agree that the community should be able to participate in the discussion on, e.g. qualifications of these panellists or the principles according to which those panellists are selected. If you look at the comments under the blog post, some of community members have already expressed their “surprise” that such important questions are asked in a blog post, circumventing public comments procedure. Please note, the Policy Department was not aware of this “call to action” either; therefore, it has not been included in the ICANN Community Leadership Digest (that’s the summary email I forward to you periodically). The idea of the Digest was that we have all the incoming requests in one place. It is impossible to monitor all channels to make sure we’re not missing anything. Blog posts should not be used to seek community input on something as important as implementation of structures described in the Bylaws.

To avoid similar situations in the future and to ensure we and other parts of our community 1) know about calls and 2) have enough time to prepare feedback, I propose that we send a letter in which we also call to action: re-launch the consultation according to proper procedure and use only one channel for gathering feedback.

If you agree, here is a draft. Your input is very much needed (do your magic)!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O9NGDIv-UGqCtANMvesgR6T9mn1lLtd2XqzQsSV8maw/edit

We do not have much time for this one. Would be nice if we could finalise it my Wednesday, 10 April.

Have a nice weekend,

]{atrina

 

_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council

--

Jordan Carter
Group Chief Executive, InternetNZ
+64-21-442-649

Sent on the run, apologies for brevity

_______________________________________________

Ccnso-council mailing list

Ccnso-council@icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council

Disclaimer:

This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses.

Other languages:

English	Estonian	Italian	Maltese	Romanian	Swedish
Czech	Spanish	Latvian	Dutch	Slovak	Greek
Danish	French	Lithuanian	Polish	Slovenian	Bulgarian
German	Gaelic	Hungarian	Portuguese	Finnish	Croatian

  ­­  

_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council