Hi Peter,
If you read further under your question (below the Action item 142-01), our discussion is described there: the proposal was to follow the same pattern we did with WS1. But we still have time to discuss the process, e.g. during our August call.
Hope that addresses your question,
]{atrina
From: Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Peter Vergote
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:06 PM
To: Kimberly Carlson <kimberly.carlson@icann.org>; ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Minutes for review: Panama F2F 27 June
Hi Kim,
Small side note on my part. Concerning the topic “final report CCWG Accountability” & my question/comment about the process.
If I’m not mistaking, Katrina immediately addressed this during the Council meeting and confirmed that members will have to decide on this. Meaning that we probably will have the same procedure as with WS1.
Might be useful to add this to the minutes so we have it somewhere documented.
Best,
Peter
From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Kimberly Carlson <kimberly.carlson@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, 17 July 2018 at 16:50
To: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] Minutes for review: Panama F2F 27 June
Dear Councilors,
Here are the Panama F2F minutes for review.
Thank you,
Kim
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Kimberly Carlson
ccNSO Support Lead Administrator
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Skype kimberly.carlson.icann
Top of Form
Bottom of Form