All,
Peter Van Roste sent me this the other day. I was not aware of
it so I asked Bart to find out the background. The response he got is below.
The council will discuss this on its next call. Any comments in
the meantime are most welcome!
Cheers,
Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer
.au Domain Administration Ltd
T: 1300 732 929 | F:
03 8341 4112
E: ceo@auda.org.au | W:www.auda.org.au
auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator
Important Notice - This
email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal
privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are
not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this
email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and
delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before
printing this email.
From: Yurie Ito <yurie.ito@icann.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:42:45 -0700
To: Patrick Jones <patrick.jones@icann.org>,
Greg Rattray <greg.rattray@icann.org>,
Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>
Subject: Re: ICANN National Survey
Hi Patrick,
This survey is a response to the ccNSO, GAC and other comments about
understanding the connections and the gaps between national CSIRTs and DNS
operations. Our intent to conduct such a survey has been consistently mentioned
in our communications related to the way forward the DNS-CERT, beginning with
our public response to comments in April. And has been part of all the
stakeholders discussions on this topic including at the Brussels meeting.
Answer to those specific questions below;
1, What is purpose of survey?
- See above.
2. How does this survey relate to the survey Rod announced in his letter to the
ccNSO in response of DNS-CERT discussion in Nairobi.
- Rod’s april memo on DNS-CERT to ccNSO and others
mentions no survey. Our May summary of analysis on comments states that
survey will be conducted in the way forward section. It is clearly addressed in
Rod’s 11th August memo to the ccNSO, gNSO and ALAC chairs to include the
participation of ENISA.
3. What will be role of ENISA role? ICANN role?
- ENISA is coordinating the survey within its region as
we prepared the survey. ENISA volunteered to do that along with other regional
CSIRT organization.
4. Has the initiative on this survey been communicated/announced to ccTLD
community? If not, will it be? CAN they influence the process?
- Through the processes described above, as well as in
the public forum of DNS-CERT at the Brussels meeting.
We willing to work with anybody going forward. We will work with them the
interpreting the analysis of survey.
CENTR is free to work with ENISA as they desire.
5. What is current status? Has the survey been conducted? If not, when
- CERT/CC sent out the survey and messages to all the
National CSIRTs last week.
6 Where ccTLD community members involved in drafting
- We are not sure why this is concerned here. Staff was
acting to answer the specific questions raised by the community, and had
announced publicly the intend to conduct such survey back to May.
7. How does this relate to the activities of the ccNSO Incident Response WG?
Have they been informed/involved?
- It does not relate to WG’s discussion directly, they
have been informed through the process described above.
Thanks,
- Yurie
------ Forwarded Message
From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:51:31 -0700
To: Patrick Jones <patrick.jones@icann.org>
Subject: Re: ICANN National Survey
Hi Patrick,
Per our discussion today on the ENISA/ ICANN survey I have the following
questions:
1, What is purpose of survey?
2. How does this survey relate to the survey Rod announced in his letter to the
ccNSO in response of DNS-CERT discussion in Nairobi.
3. What will be role of ENISA role? ICANN role?
4. Has the initiative on this survey been communicated/announced to ccTLD
community? If not, will it be? CAN they influence the process?
5. What is current status? Has the survey been conducted? If not, when?
6 Where ccTLD community members involved in drafting?
7. How does this relate to the activities of the ccNSO Incident Response WG?
Have they been informed/involved?
If possible I would appreciate some answers a soon as possible, either by
phone, Skype so I can get back to Chris.
Bart