Hi Jordan

I share your concerns. We don't have infinite resources, neither from volunteers or support staff. That is why the creation of the WG is classified as High-Effort.

To better understand our real limits, there should be an analysis of the current ongoing WGs and their real demands. Not all working groups operate on the same rhythm and/or use the same amount of resources. Something for the Triage to look after for load balancing? ;)

Best,
Alejandra

*******************************************
Work like you don't need the money.
Love like you've never been hurt.
Dance like nobody's watching.
Sing like nobody's listening.
And live like it's Heaven on Earth.
*******************************************


On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:15 AM Jordan Carter via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Hi all

Thanks to you all involved with pulling this together.

The proposed suggestions look like a manageable commitment at this time, assuming we can engage some ccNSO community members who are not already involved.

I would like to raise one broader issue arising from this for us to consider:

Not very long ago we set up a new DNS Abuse group. Now we are setting up another one, and nobody is proposing we shut down the DNS one.

If another issue comes along; do we set up another group? And another?

In other words - how should we set some parameters about maximum groups, or complexity? 

Do we just keep going while we have volunteers, dealing with each issue as they arrive? 

To me that is one reasonable approach - as long as we have volunteers with genuine capacity to engage in the work.

Are there other thoughts?

Cheers
Jordan 

Jordan Carter 
Internet Governance and Policy Director 

.au Domain Administration
+61-417-243-647
From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 7:39:25 PM
To: ccnso-council@icann.org <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - [ccnso-council] Your feed-back on Roadmap ccNSO&UA: Tuesday 21 February
 

Dear all,

Following the introduction of the ccNSo & UA roadmap Council meeting 192, could you be so kind to provide your feed-back, if any on the draft (included)?

To be most helpful, the ad-hoc group would appreciate to hear from you by Tuesday  21 February 17.00 UTC,

Thank you,

Kind regards,

BArt

_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.