Hi Katrina, all

I agree with Peter’s comments.  I know the ERT will welcome this submission from the ccNSO Council.

Cheers
Debbie

On 14/02/2019, at 05:16, Peter Vergote <peter.vergote@dnsbelgium.be> wrote:

Dear all,

 

I’m all fine with the version as it currently reads (taking into account the edits by Giovanni and Pablo).

 

Think it is good a) to confirm that CSC is working efficiently b) to acknowledge the efforts and used methodology by the RT and c) to endorse their findings

 

Kind regards,

 

Peter

 

Peter Vergote

Legal & Corp. Affairs Manager

+32 16 29 89 28

+32 474 790096

www.dnsbelgium.be

<image001.png>

 

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>
Date: Wednesday, 13 February 2019 at 13:32
To: 'ccNSO Council' <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] Draft comments on the CSC Effectiveness Review's report

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

As you may remember, CSC Effectiveness Review Team chose a light-weight approach and skillfully conducted the review, thus, showing that even in ICANN environment it is indeed possible to do things and get results quickly and efficiently. They have published the draft report: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/csc-effectiveness-initial-16jan19-en.pdf

 

To support the team, their findings and approach they used, the Council could submit their comments.

 

The draft of Council’s comments (Google docs, as agreed):

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ndCtyayeLIgh94Re7kyCk4oLWqPljJ1o-aPJeZjlah0/edit

 

Do you support the idea and the text? Is there anything else you would like to add? Please comment by  20 February.

 

Thank you!

 

Kind regards,

 

]{atrina

_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council