Hi Lesley,

Agree… however, I’m actually not able to say at what point they dropped off and re-joined, as it is only clear they are not present/present when they were asked to cast a vote. So – is it OK if I leave it as it is?

Gabi

From: lesley@nominet.org.uk [mailto:lesley@nominet.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:32 PM
To: Gabriella Schittek
Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org; Drazek, Keith; Olivier Guillard; 'Victor Ciza'
Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] Minutes from Mexico

Hi Gabi,

Understood. The usual format is to note the point when participants leave and then note again when they re-join, but I agree its messy!

Have a good weekend.

Lesley

Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> wrote on 20/03/2009 13:27:09:

> Hi Lesley,
>  
> Thanks for your input.
>  
> Just a quick reply to :
>  
> “BTW, it might be easier to just note after 38-08 that the
> councillors participating by telephone did not do so after this
> point, due to connection problems (rather than repeating the dropped
> off text from then onwards)”
>  
> The problem is just that they were re-connected for resolution 38-12
> and 28-13, but were disconnected again for resolution 38-14, so I’m
> not sure what the most elegant solution would be here.
>  
> Gabi

>  
> From: lesley@nominet.org.uk [mailto:lesley@nominet.org.uk]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:20 PM
> To: Gabriella Schittek
> Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org; Drazek, Keith; Olivier Guillard; owner-
> ccnso-council@icann.org; 'Victor Ciza'
> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Minutes from Mexico
>  
>
> Hi Gabi,
>
> Thanks. Some comments from me:
>
> - Under section 3, I think we should note that the suggestion to
> have 2 vice chairs was agreed. (Did we vote? - I think we should have)
> - 38-08 I think we should add that this was passed unanimously 'by
> those present'. Ditto subsequent resolutions. BTW, it might be
> easier to just note after 38-08 that the councillors participating
> by telephone did not do so after this point, due to connection
> problems (rather than repeating the dropped off text from then onwards)
> - Under 11.1, I think this should refer to the 'ccNSO work plan' not
> the 'planning agenda'.
> - Under 11.2, I think that the references to 'ccNSO members meetings
> agendas' should be 'ccNSO member meeting agendas'
>
> Regards,
> Lesley
>
> owner-ccnso-council@icann.org wrote on 18/03/2009 07:24:37:
>
> > Dear Councillors,
> >
> > The minutes from the last Council meeting are attached. Please, can
> > I have your comment/corrections by next Wednesday, 25th March.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Gabi
> > [attachment "council minutes cd.doc" deleted by Lesley Cowley/Nominet]