I have no particular problem with the underlying report, which reflect Lyman's usual good work.  I do think that there are problems with the mitigation proposal itself, and a variety of applicants are working to put together a plan involving less delay.  I would not want to undermine that effort.


J. Beckwith Burr

Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer

1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006

Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz


From: Roelof Meijer <Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl>
Date: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 3:21 AM
To: 'Gabriella Schittek' <gabriella.schittek@icann.org>, "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] RE: Request for input on Proposal to Mitigate Name Collision Risks

I would not mind if we send a brief statement in support of the document

 

Cheers, Roelof

 

From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Gabriella Schittek
Sent: maandag 19 augustus 2013 17:18
To: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: [ccnso-council] Request for input on Proposal to Mitigate Name Collision Risks

 

Dear Councillors,

 

Below is a summary of a request for input on the Proposal to Mitigate Name Collision Risks. The Triage committee has not decided on how to deal with this topic, but the general recommendation is "None". If you do not agree on this, please, send your proposed way forward to the Council email list by 21 August.

 

Thanks!

 

Gabi

 

 

===

 

 

Topic: Proposal to Mitigate Name Collision Risks

  

Originator: ICANN

  

Summary of request: ICANN has published a document, suggesting mitigation measures to the community to minimise the likelihood of any potential impact resulting from name collisions as New gTLDs are delegated into the root zone: http://www.icann.org/en/about/staff/security/ssr/new-gtld-collision-mitigation-05aug13-en.pdf

 

Date received: 5 August

  

Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 27 August 2013

  

Recommended action, if any: (alternatives: None, letter from Chair/ Council, ccNSO statement/position paper, WG, PDP): None

  

Expertise needed, if any: Technical

   

Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Low