Hi Nick,

Usually, such decisions are taken (thus, discussed, recorded and reflected in minutes that are published) during Council calls.

Kind regards,

]{atrina

From: Nick Wenban-Smith [mailto:Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 1:47 PM
To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>; ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] General selection procedure

Hi Katrina

This all looks sensible with a public call for interest and objective assessment, and decisions made and reasoning explained.

Where the decision is made not to appoint a ccNSO rep (eg for the ePDP) should that not also be explained also?

Best wishes

Nick

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki
Sent: 01 April 2019 09:22
To: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: [ccnso-council] General selection procedure

Dear Colleagues,

Here is another guideline for you to review before we send it to the community for their feedback.

In many cases we have specific guidelines that describe procedure of how we select members to certain groups, e.g. to CSC, IFRT, review teams. But sometimes we do not have a specific guideline for the process, e.g. when we are asked to appoint somebody to a CCWG. For those cases, the Guidelines Review Committee developed a general guideline.

Please have a look and let me know if there are any suggestions/ideas/corrections by the end of the week.

Kind regards,

]{atrina