Dear Katrina, Bart,
Thank you for your alert elaboration on this.
Hiro
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:29:44 +0200
"Katrina Sataki" <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:
> Dear Hiro,
>
> Thank you for your comment! It's a fair observation!
>
> Bart proposed to include reference to the Bylaws and also information about
> IDN ccTLDs:
>
> "The ccNSO notes that the definition used to describe members of the ccNSO
> is not precise. According to the ICANN Bylaws the ccNSO shall have a
> membership consisting of ccTLD managers. For purposes of this Article 10, a
> ccTLD manager is the organization or entity responsible for managing an ISO
> 3166 country-code top-level domain, or under any later variant, for that
> country-code top-level domain.
>
> Based on the original definition IDN ccTLDs are excluded from the ccNSO,
> However the ccNSO does consider them part of the community, and in the near
> future, when the overall policy for the selection of IDN ccTLD strings will
> be adopted by the ICANN Board of Directors, the bylaws should be amended as
> suggested to allow IDN ccTLD to become members."
>
> I am sending the updated survey to Mathieu.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Kind regards,
>
> ]{atrina
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hotta@jprs.co.jp [mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp]
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 3:49 AM
> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>
> Cc: 'Bart Boswinkel' <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>; 'ccNSO Council'
> <ccnso-council@icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] CCWG-Acct (WS 2, SO/AC sub-group) SO/AC
> Questions on ccNSO Accountability
>
> Katrina, Bart,
>
> Thank you for this.
>
> As to "Designated Community" question :
>
> I'm not very sure whether the definition of "ccTLD managers"
> is clear enough here.
>
> In our response, it might be better to clearly say "ccTLD managers
> registered in IANA Database" or something like that.
>
> Hiro
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:55:38 +0200
> "Katrina Sataki" <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >
> >
> > As Bart already informed you, here are draft responses to the
> questionnaire. Please let us know if you have any comments and additions by
> Friday, 2 December!
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > ]{atrina
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org
> > [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org ] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 6:46 PM
> > To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
> > Subject: [ccnso-council] CCWG-Acct (WS 2, SO/AC sub-group) SO/AC
> > Questions on ccNSO Accountability
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > The co-chairs of the CCWG-Accountability reached out to the chairs of the
> SO/AC to seek responses from the SO/AC on a survey compiled by the WS 2
> SO/AC Accountability subgroup. The message and survey itself are included.
> >
> >
> >
> > In order to be of assistance to SO/AC Accountability the following process
> to respond to the questions is suggested:
> >
> > - Katrina in her capacities as chair of the ccNSO and chair of the
> Guideline Review Committee and with assistance of the secretariat, will
> draft responses to the survey.
> >
> > - The draft responses will be circulated to Council early next week
> (most likely Tuesday 29 November)
> >
> > - Councillors are requested to comment, provide additional input by
> Friday 2 December, noon UTC
> >
> > - Katrina (with assistance of the secretariat) will consolidate
> comments and prepare final draft version of responses on Friday 2 December.
> >
> > - Email decision by Council by 5 December 2016 17.00 UTC.
> >
> > - Inform the co-chairs.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Bart
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Message from the co-chairs
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent on behalf of the CCWG-Accountability WS2 Co-Chair's
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear SO/AC Chairs,
> >
> >
> >
> > As you are aware, the newly-adopted ICANN bylaws tasked our Cross
> Community Working Group to investigate several issues as part of our Work
> Stream 2 effort. SO/AC Accountability is one of these items. As part of
> this effort, we have set up a subgroup, responsible for reviewing how each
> SO and AC is accountable to its designated community, and potentially to
> global Internet stakeholders as well. The background and progress for this
> group are described here[docs.google.com].
> >
> >
> >
> > As part of this effort, the group intends to start by an assessment of the
> current situation. That's why we are turning to you to point us to resources
> and documents used to maintain accountability to your respective designated
> community, taking into account the particular or specific working modalities
> of each SO/AC (and any subgroups).
> >
> >
> >
> > We would appreciate if you could provide responses to the attached
> questions within the next 30 days, so that work on this important item of
> WS2 can proceed in due course. Responses can be provided to
> acct-staff@icann.org <mailto:acct-staff@icann.org> . Along with the
> rapporteurs of the SO/AC accountability subgroup, Cheryl Langdon-Orr,
> Farzaneh Badii and Steve Del Bianco, we thank you in advance and remain
> available for any clarification that you may need.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Leon, Thomas & Mathieu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>