Agree.
Oscar
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010
2:31 AM
To:
Cc: Patricio Poblete
Subject: RE: RE: [ccnso-council]
letter to GAC re IDN ccTLD GAC Principles
I feel more comfortable with Patricio's version.
- YE
보낸사람:
받는사람: Patricio Poblete [ppoblete@nic.cl]
날 짜: 2010년
1월 19일(화)
11:50:08
제 목: RE: [ccnso-council] letter to GAC re
IDN ccTLD GAC Principles
Agree and will make
necessary changes.
CEO - auDA
au Domain
Administration Ltd
Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of
the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email
by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010
13:41
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council]
letter to GAC re IDN ccTLD GAC Principles
Chris,
Hiro is right. As a council, we are not (yet) in a position to say if we agree
or not with the statements contained in this document. Perhaps we could say the
following instead:
While
the
Patricio
HiroHOTTA wrote:
Hi Chris, Thank you.I think it's a very thoughtful and fair response. Just one comment : fifth paragraph beginning with 'Throughout' the second sentence goes : While the ccNSO Council agrees with many of the principles stated by the GAC, it holds concerns about the way in which a finalised GAC position would impact upon ICANN’s ongoing multi-stakeholder processes. For me, 'agrees' sounds very strong considering that we haven't had a discussion among us as a step of PDP, just as GAC is also at the start of PDP. So, may I propose the replacement of 'agrees' to 'shares views' or some milder word ? Hiro On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:13:58 +1100 (EST)"Chris Disspain " <ceo@auda.org.au> wrote: