Barrack, 1) you do not need to appologise for being a non-native English speaker – the world consisting only of native speakers would be a very boring one J 2) I am not a native English speaker either – that could be the reason why I need a more detailed explanation. Therefore, I am going back to my question: could you please describe your idea in more detail? I did not understand, for example, what do you mean by panel or “select a panel”? The idea of discussing issues regionally, could provide an interesting twist but I would like to know why you think this is the way?

 

Thank you!

 

]{atrina

 

 

 

From: Barrack Otieno [mailto:otieno.barrack@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2019 4:45 PM
To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>
Cc: Giovanni Seppia <giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu>; ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Council workshop in Montreal

 

Hi Katrina,

 

Excuse me for not being a native English speaker. By members i meant the rest of the Council members or audience participating in the workshop. Basically show us the problem and be part of the solution.

 

Regards

 

Regards

 

On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, 4:20 pm Katrina Sataki, <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:

Hi Barrack,

 

Thanks for your suggestion. However, I am not sure I understand it. We are talking about the Council workshop, not members meeting.

Could you please clarify the set-up you are proposing?

 

Thanks!

 

]{atrina

 

 

 

From: Barrack Otieno [mailto:otieno.barrack@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2019 3:22 PM
To: Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu>
Cc: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>; ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Council workshop in Montreal

 

Hi Katrina,

 

What if we collect issues of concern from Council members and select a panel randomly from each region to discuss how the issues can be resolved. We can then open the floor for more contribution or debate from members who will not be seating on the panel.

 

Best

 

On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, 3:17 pm Giovanni Seppia, <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu> wrote:

Dear Katrina,

Thanks for starting the process of collecting input for the Council workshop.

I would suggest we start from the “fears, hopes and other findings of the previous workshop”. I do remember that we had said that we would have addressed the findings at the next workshop.

Are there minutes of the workshop we had earlier this year, I could not find them.

Best,

 

Giovanni

 

 

Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager

EURid vzw 

Telecomlaan 9, 1831 Diegem, Belgium

T: +32 2 401 27 50 | M: +39 335 8141733

www.eurid.eu

RPR Brussel – VAT BE 0864.240.405                     

  

 

 

 

Dear Councillors,

As you probably remember, in Kobe we agreed that we need more Council workshops. Unfortunately, we could not make it in Marrakech but we will definitely do that in Montreal. Currently, we have booked three 90 minute blocks on Sunday (starting at 9 am). Two blocks for the workshop and one block for our prep-meeting.

However, booking slots is the easiest part. We need to fill them up with meaningful, useful, and interesting activities. If we can’t think of enough of such kind of activities, we can always go for one block of workshop instead of two (we will have a prep-meeting in any case). If we have interesting ideas, we will need to plan and prepare them to make the most out of our team efforts. To make a long story short, now is the time to propose ideas for our workshop in Montreal!

To kick start the brainstorming:

-          How to help new people to get engaged? Here I’d like to point to what I think is a great suggestion. A month ago Eberhard shared an idea on the mailing list “…to find someone who has not been involved in ccNSO activities, preferably under the age of 30 to serve as an observer...” – this (these) person(s) could observe activities on different groups, e.g. IFR, other review teams, our members on CCWGs, and help our members by writing reports to the Council, members, and ccTLD community.

-          ccNSO review recommendations. If the Board adopts the recommendations by the meeting in Montreal, we could look into those and discuss how to proceed.

-          ccNSO website. What information we need, how to structure it, etc.

-          How to (re)shape our interaction with other SOACs?

-          any ideas for a hands-on session?

 

The ball is yours! Please share your ideas!

 

Kind regards,

 

]{atrina

 

 


Disclaimer:

This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses.

 

  ­­  

_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.