Dear all,
Please find included the following:
Agenda, with draft resolutions included
Kind regards,
Bart
……………
Agenda and draft Resolutions
ccNSO Council Meeting
16 April 2020
Noon (18.00) UTC
Minutes the minutes of the 12 March 2020 meeting have been distributed 14 April 2020.
Action items and To-do’s
Action Item 157-01
Call to review charters, pending
Action Item 161-01
Chair, with assistance from Secretariat, built Council Chair “knowledge base”. Ongoing
Action Item 161-02
Circulate time zone chart to Council list: Completed
To-do:
Move April Council meeting to 18:00 UTC. Done
Informational
Draft Resolution
Background
In accordance with the Charter of the WG its members nominated Stephen Deerhake, .AS as Chair and Eberhard Lisse, .NA as Vice-Chair of the WG Review Mechanism. Both of the candidates accepted the nomination and no other candidates were nominated.
Decision
In accordance with the Charter of the ccPDP3 Review Mechanism WG, the ccNSO Council appoints Stephen Deerhake, .AS as Chair and Eberhard Lisse, .NA as Vice-Chair of the WG.
Draft Resolution
The ccNSO Council appoints Patricio Poblete (.CL) as member of the ccPDP3 Review Mechanism WG.
Informational.
Letter from Maarten Botterman, chair of the ICANN Board of Directors
Informational: Tentative timeline.
For discussion
i. Informational
ii. Decision to approve change IANA Naming Function SLA Creation-Transfer ccTLDs
Draft Resolution
Background
The Chair of the CSC recently ( letter dated 20 February 2020) requested the ccNSO and GNSO Councils to approve the to change the SLA for the ccTLD
Creation and Transfer Process as detailed in the document: Service levels for the ccTLD Creation and Transfer Process, version 9 January 2020. The approval of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils is required under the IANA Naming Function Contract procedure to amend SLAs.
Decision
The ccNSO Council approves and supports the change of the IANA Naming Function SLA Creation-Transfer ccTLDs process as proposed by the CSC and PTI. The Chair of the Council is requested to inform the Chair of the Customer Standing Committee and Chair of the GNSO Council accordingly.
How to structure approval process Final Report?
Background
The CCWG Auction Proceeds is on the brink of finalizing its Final Report and submitting it to the Chartering Organisations to seek support for its recommendations. According to the Charter of the CCWG Auction Proceeds the ccNSO as one of the Chartering Organisations will therefore be asked whether the ccNSO supports the CCWG Auction Proceeds recommendations. Given the virtual nature of ICANN68 for discussion how does the ccNSO Council want to structure the decision making process? Options:
Background material: email exchanges