Hi Stephen,

I agree, that is why I was trying to tweak the language in a way to avoid “interpret”.

Best,

Giovanni

Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager

Phone: +32 (0)2 401 27 50

Mobile: +39 335 8141733

Address: Woluwelaan 150 - 1831 Diegem - Belgium

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Stephen Deerhake @ ASNIC
Sent: 23 November 2018 22:00
To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>; ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] CORRECTION regarding my stated views regarding the proposall to have the Board make an "interpretation" regarding the Bylaw IRFT Bylaw problem

My comment regarding this should have read:

Being a rather strict Being a rather strict constructionalist when it comes to the Bylaws, I cannot concur with Katrina’s suggestion regarding having the Board “interpret” the relevant Bylaw. To me, that’s a very slippery slope.

Best regards,

/Stephen

This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses.

English	Estonian	Italian	Maltese	Romanian	Swedish
Czech	Spanish	Latvian	Dutch	Slovak	Greek
Danish	French	Lithuanian	Polish	Slovenian	Bulgarian
German	Gaelic	Hungarian	Portuguese	Finnish	Croatian