Hi Katrina

I agree with Alejandra’s comments - even the time of any call :)

I think that nominating a sub committee makes sense given the time constraints on the whole process but like the accountability of the full Council voting.

What I would like to see as part of this though, is clear criteria that are going to be used as a guide for evaluating the applicants.  What are the key skills required and the priority of each.  Some sort of decision making matrix if you like so that there is some objectivity of assessing the candidates based on what we believe are the most important.  Geographical and gender diversity can be part of the mix but what priority do they have in comparison with knowledge of IANA systems.  

If we can agree the skills we want our representatives on this to possess and be able to document those as part of a decision matrix that should hopefully make the decision process a bit easier and consistent.  Ideally if we can include the sort of skill set we are after in our call for expressions of interest we can get an ideal pool of candidates to consider.

Cheers
Debbie


On 1/06/2016, at 05:51, Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> wrote:

Dear Katrina

The schedule seems like we'll be running a marathon, but do hope we'll be successful in this endeavor. ;)

Regarding your questions:
  1. How to ensure diversity? With only two spots available, it won't be easy.
    1. What to do if our top 2 candidates are:
      1. from the same region: We could evaluate how far ranked the top 5 candidates are among themselves and see if there is a possibility to select our candidates from different regions. In any case, we could hope to see real diversity in the full slate.
      2. both are not willing to serve 3 years: we appoint them anyway and see in 20 months if there is still no will to continue for one more year. If that is the case then we could use the vacancy procedure.
  2. How to vote for the final selection of 2 ccNSO members to the CSC (email or call)? I'm open for any mechanism.
  3. How to ensure quorum in any case? If we decide to do a call, the time should be at 11 UTC (even though it is tough on Debbie & me it's the most amiable hour for the majority). By email every Councilor should send their vote and/or comments.
  4. Adoption of CSC: I prefer the second option that says as follows:
    1. The ccNSO Council nominates a sub-committee of Councillors (e.g., 1 Councillor per region and 1 NomCom appointed Councillor) to select the final slate in consultation with the RySG and the GNSO Council and the full ccNSO Council votes on the full slate (email or call).
Sincerely,
Alejandra


Registro de Dominios .gt
--
Universidad del Valle de Guatemala.
18 Ave. 11-95. Z. 15. V.H. III.
Edificio J. Oficina 204.
Tels: +502.23688564 y +502.23688565

    

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:

 

Dear Councillors,

 

Any thoughts on the preferences re decision making for selecting the Customer Standing Committee?

Any other comments/suggestions?

Thank you!

 

Kind regards,

 

]{atrina

 

From: Katrina Sataki [mailto:katrina@nic.lv]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 2:44 PM
To: 'ccnso-council@icann.org' <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: ATTENTION! Information on CSC

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

For your convenience and in order to foster further discussions we have prepared information (see attachment) on things we need to do and issues we need to agree on in order to have a functional Customer Standing Committee by 10 August.

 

Please have a look at the document. Your ideas and input is crucial!

 

Although there are still things that are not entirely clear, I believe we have a rather complete picture of the path forward. Please do not hesitate to ask if further clarification is needed!

 

Have a nice weekend!

 

Kindest regards,

 

]{atrina