Thank you Bart for the background – much clearer!
I need I need to sit down with you at some point with lots of coffee (or something stronger) and try to understand what all these policies are. As you say there’s been evolution and there is a lot
of complicated interaction between the different pieces.
So in terms of the paper I think I get now what it is after.
Just wondered if there was a target date for them to conclude their deliberations?
Best wishes
Nick
From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>
Sent: 26 April 2019 01:08
To: Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk>; Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt>; Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr>
Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference
Hi Nick,
Thanks for asking. The role of the group is effectively triaging the draft overall IDN ccTLD policy on what needs to be done and after this triage provide guidance on how it the updating could
be done as efficiently and effectively as possible.
The issues that (may) need to be fixed are multiple:
- Overall draft policy is outdated because of evolution of Fast Track Process, in area of confusing similarity. Related is the divergence
between GNSO and ccNSO policies ( initially the structure and criteria were the same)
- Overall draft policy has at least one placeholder ( on variant management) that needs to be included ( also by GNSO in subpro process)
- Parts of the draft policy need to reviewed, on whether outdated/overtaken by events or not ( for example requirement of list)
- Should part of inclusion of IDN ccTLD in ccNSO be updated? Who to review? And ask for Bylaw change asap?
The processes on how to fix the different issues may be differ: ultimately everything needs to come together through a ccNSO PDP to turn the selection of IDNccTLD strings into an ICANN Policy.
However some parts need to be worked on as sub-part/outside the PDP and then feed-into the policy development effort ( for example for the variance management, the Board requested the ccNSO and GNSO to work together)
Hope this helps,
Kind regards,
Bart
From:
Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>
on behalf of Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk>
Date: Thursday, 25 April 2019 at 21:54
To: Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt>, Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr>
Cc: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference
OK thanks for this. I think I support the intent of this initiative.
Having read through this document however (and with no real background in IDNs or the fast track process etc) I am still struggling a bit to work out what exactly is going on here. I remain unsure what exactly the problem
is that this is trying to fix.
Could that be made clearer perhaps? Also as a general comment there are a lot of long sentences which I didn’t really understand or had to read several times to try and work out what they were trying to say.
Sorry if I am sounding negative here. But I think it’s important to be as clear as we can because I’m sure many of the folks we are trying to reach out to here will be in the same position as me.
Best wishes
Nick
From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>
On Behalf Of Alejandra Reynoso
Sent: 25 April 2019 18:23
To: Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr>
Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference
Dear All
I made a few edits in form, not in substance. Please find in attachment.
Overall I approve the document.
Best,
Alejandra
--
|
|
|
|
|
Alejandra Reynoso |
|
|
|
P: +502 23688565 |
|
|
|
18
Ave. 11 [maps.google.com]-42 Zona 15, V.H. III. |
|
|
|
|
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:47 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> wrote:
Hi Bart,
I have no objections with the current version.
regards,
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 5:13 AM Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
As proposed on the 18 April 2019 Council call included for adoption the Terms of Reference for the Review Team, which is to conduct a Preliminary review of the IDN ccTLD recommended policy. Please note that after re-reading the text section 5.2 sub 1 has been slightly changed: it now reads Conduct a review of the relevant documentation referenced in Section 6 of these Terms of Reference, and other material considered relevant by the PRT.
The marked text has been added to ensure that the Review team can take all documentation it deems relevant into account.
Please let us know your vote, in particular whether you object or abstain from taken a decision by 26 April 2019, 17.00 UTC.
Thank you, and kind regards,
Bart Boswinkel
_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council