Nigel,

You are, of course, right! And the question is not stupid at all. However, the answer is not simple. 

The Council established a group to review the election process and to identify issues related to the current voting scheme. I am chairing the group. During our discussions we also identified several related issues (which are not directly relevant to the main task of our group but which we thought are worth exploring). One of the issues concerns the current quorum rule. In Beijing we presented our finding to the Council and the Council agreed that the quorum rule should be discussed by a larger group. I will keep you informed!

Kind regards,

]{atrina

 

-- Katrina Sataki, CEO

 

emlogo

 

NIC.LV – The Registry of ccTLD .lv

Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science,

University of Latvia

Raina bulvaris 29, Riga LV-1459

Tel: +371 67085858 | Fax: +371 67225072 | Mobile: +371 29249666

E-mail: katrina@nic.lv | Skype: kat..s | Web: www.nic.lv

-- €

From: Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>
Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 1:38 PM
To: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org>
Cc: "ccnso-members@icann.org" <ccnso-members@icann.org>, "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org>, <nigel@channelisles.net>
Subject: Re: [ccnso-members] Reminder: Voting on IDN ccPDP

Can someone please explain the logic of the voting procedure.

If all we do if the quorum is not reached, is have another vote where the quorum doesn't apply, then I fail to see the point of having a quorum.

(Forgive me for asking such a stupid question, but we weren't members when these rules were adopted).



On 06/04/2013 11:22 AM, Gabriella Schittek wrote:
Dear ccNSO members,

Again, this is a reminder that the voting on the IDN ccPDP is closing in one week, 11 June 23:59 UTC. To date, we have received 41 votes – many thanks to all of you who have voted! – however, we need to reach at least 68 votes so that the voting is valid. I would therefore be grateful if you could take some time to cast your vote.

All of our primary contacts should have received a ballot on Tuesday, 21 May from tally@tally.icann.org – if you can't find this, please, check your spam filter. If you can't find it there, please, contact me!

For those of you who feel you wish to learn more what the voting is about, please see our recording from the two webinars that were held on this topic: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/p9b0ox2ifdb/ and http://icann.adobeconnect.com/p9q9eux8m27/ 

Kind regards,

Gabi