Chris,
Sounds as a very interesting exercise.
Speaking about the ccNSO representatives how
do you think we should manage it? The comments should be coordinated before
among us, or will be personal comments with no need to check with the rest of
the ccNSO ?
Best,
Oscar
From:
owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain
Sent: Domingo, 15 de Febrero de
2009 04:17 p.m.
To: ccNSO Council; ccNSO Members
Subject: [ccnso-council] ACSO Open
Joint Sessions in
All,
Below is a note from the Chairs of the ICANN Supporting
Organisations and Advisory Committees. If you are interested in volunteering to
be on the panel in either or both of the sessions outlined below please let me
know as soon as possible.
“On the Monday of the
The format is a discussion among selected members
of each of the Supporting Organisations and Advisory Committees. Each SO and AC
will designate up to four people per session in order to represent a range of
perspectives.
The meeting will be held in two 90-minute sessions,
separated by a 30-minute break, and with a 30-minute feedback period at the
end. There will be two broad discussion topics of common interest, with
specific sub-questions. They are:
14:00-15:30 -- EXPANDING THE NAME
SPACE
-
What is the impact of the new gTLD
and IDNccTLD Fast Track processes on the market structure of the Domain Name
Space and ICANN’s processes?
-
How should geographic names be
handled and is there a blurring of “cc” and “g” spaces ?
-
What should be the cost and the
pricing structure for new TLDs (both application fee and ongoing fees)?
16:00-17.30 -- IMPROVING
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
-
What do we mean by “policy
development”?
-
How can technical expertise and
input from stakeholders be included early in the process?
-
What changes, if any, could be made
to ICANN’s processes to allow for more effective policy development?
The objective in each session is to have an open
discussion rather than statements of official position, in order to foster a
common understanding within the community. These sessions will not take
decisions nor does the group represent a decision-making body.
Sessions will be public and transcribed, but they
are not a public forum. Opinion will however be sought during the discussion
through the use of coloured cards to represent whether people agree or disagree
with a particular comment or proposal put forward. A feedback period will
follow at 1730 where members of the community will be invited to comment on any
of the topics discussed in the previous two sessions.
Please note that the session and its format remain
experimental in an effort to improve discussion and interaction between
Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees. As such, not only do we
expect to learn from the session in Mexico but we will be seeking feedback from
the SOs and ACs themselves after the meeting is over in order to identify
improvements for ICANN’s next meeting in Sydney in June.”
Cheers,
Chris Disspain
CEO - auDA
Important Notice - This
email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal
privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are
not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this
email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and
delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before
printing this email.