We can also add:

What is the gNSO position to a TLD organisation that wants to run a new gTLD? (Of course, these questions will also need the ccNSO as well to formulate its views).

Vika

From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Vika Mpisane
Sent: 14 March 2011 02:16 AM
To: 'ccNSO Council'
Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

May be we can also add:

- What does the GNSO anticipate to be overlaps in relation to representation where a cc also runs a gTLD (because in such a case that means the same cc will be both a ccNSO & a gNSO member)? Does this mean the need for the ccNSO & gNSO meetings & collaborations will even be more justified?

Regards,

Vika Mpisane

ZADNA

+27 11 275 0082

From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lesley Cowley
Sent: 14 March 2011 12:25 AM
To: Chris Disspain; ccNSO Council
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

Could we ask some of these as 'mirror' questions ie:

- What is the GNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct ccNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?

- Does the GNSO see value in meeting with the ccNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?

- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the GNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?

Lesley Cowley, OBE

CEO, Nominet

http://www.nominet.org.uk/

From: Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:15:20 +1100
To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

See below for suggested agenda for our lunch with gnso tomorrow (Monday).

Looks fine to me.

Cheers,

Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer

.au Domain Administration Ltd

T: 1300 732 929 | F: 03 8341 4112

E: ceo@auda.org.au | W:www.auda.org.au

auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator

Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com]
Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26
To: Chris Disspain
Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

Chris,

The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow.

We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.

Stéphane

- A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.

- What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?

- Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?

- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?

- Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate?

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5950 (20110313) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com