:-) I agree with the text
Regards.
M

Margarita Valdés Cortés, MBM-UAI
Attorney - Legal & Business Manager
NIC Chile - University of Chile
www.nic.cl 
+56229407734


El 03-04-2019, a la(s) 10:29, Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> escribió:

+1 to Nick's edits.

Best regards,
Alejandra

--

Photograph
Alejandra Reynoso
Investigación & Desarrollo Dominios .gt
P: +502 23688565
E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt
18 Ave. 11-42 Zona 15, V.H. III.
Guatemala, Guatemala
www.gt



On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:06 AM Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu> wrote:

Hi Katrina,

 

Thanks for it.

 

I checked the text and I fully support all the edits by Nick (well-done!).

 

Best,

 

Giovanni

 

 

<image002.jpg>Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager

 

Phone: +32 (0)2 401 27 50

Mobile: +39 335 8141733

Website: www.eurid.eu

Address: Woluwelaan 150 - 1831 Diegem - Belgium

                     

<image003.jpg> <image004.jpg> <image005.jpg>      

 

 

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki
Sent: 02 April 2019 20:52
To: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: [ccnso-council] ccNSO letter to the Board regarding Bylaws change

 

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

Here is a draft for our letter to the ICANN Board regarding the need to change ICANN Bylaws and make sure that we can start IANA Function Review even if no ccNSO non-member ccTLD representative can be found:

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ce-sWgXEY7yIRsZlPqu10TrFgXpKRkZXksIqc5pAHKs/edit#heading=h.gjdgxs

 

If you remember explanation from ICANN Legal, the process would be:

1)     We write a letter to the Board explaining what needs to be changes and why,

2)     The Board instructs ICANN Legal to look into the issue,

3)     ICANN Legal proposes changes,

4)     Due process (public comments etc.),

5)     Board decision -> Approval Action,

6)     The Bylaws are changed (if we have support from other SO/ACs).

 

However, in the letter we already propose some wording: we should try to make it as neutral as possible, i.e. even if all three mebers are from non-member ccTLDs (if ccTLDs start leaving the ccNSO, for example), it should not be a stopper.

 

Please suggest your improvements directly in the Google doc by 12 April.

 

Kind regards,

 

]{atrina

 


Disclaimer:

This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses.



Other languages:
English Estonian Italian Maltese Romanian Swedish
Czech Spanish Latvian Dutch Slovak Greek
Danish French Lithuanian Polish Slovenian Bulgarian
German Gaelic Hungarian Portuguese Finnish Croatian
  ­­  
_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council