Dear all,

As a reminder, the next CWG ISTP call is scheduled for Wednesday, 10 August at 19:00 UTC.  The original email from Bart explaining the call, is below.

Please find the dial-in detail:

Dial in numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann/

Conference ID: 2838

Adobe Room with audio:  https://icann.adobeconnect.com/cwg-istp/

Kind regards,

Kim Carlson

From: Bart Boswinkel
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:45 AM
To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>; Byron Holland <byron.holland@cira.ca>; Jay Daley <jay@nzrs.net.nz>
Cc: cwg-istp@icann.org; ccnso-council@icann.org; Kimberly Carlson <kimberly.carlson@icann.org>
Subject: Re: Adobe Connect - Note Pod Content from CWG-ISTP

Dear Katrina, Byron and Jay

As you will see from the informal notes from this week’s ISTP call, the members and active participants involved in the implementation work around the CWG-Stewardship proposal seek active participation from a broader group of people, in particular from Councillors and the ccNSO appointed members on the CSC (who will be actively involved in post-IANA transition work). In the view of the active members and participants in that work, things are moving rather fast and will set the parameters around PTI and hence CSC and other groups.

FYI: the ISTP is a smaal coordination group from ccTLD people closely involved in the implementation of the CWG-stewardship Proposal ( Lise, Allan, Martin, Maarten and Paul, and meets regularly)

Kim will send out a Doodle poll shortly for a call on 10-11 August and will include you as well, with a copy to Council.

Kind regards,

Bart

From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>
Date: Thursday 28 July 2016 at 09:01
To: "cwg-istp@icann.org" <cwg-istp@icann.org>
Subject: FW: Adobe Connect - Note Pod Content from CWG-ISTP

Dear all,

Please find included the informal notes from the previous call

Kind regards,

Bart

CWG ISTP Call - 26 July @19:00 UTC

1. Welcome 

2. Update CSC formation & Update RZERC 

a. Invite ccTLD operators on CSC future calls?

3. SLE discussion & progress

4. Progress PTI Bylaws and contract language

5. IRP status

6. Next call

7. AOB

Question

Bart need to send out guideline to Maarten: Done 

Paul Kane:

Council members and CSC members

- Vital stage to have Council members involved

Martin: Agree flag that is members do not need to make an effort on what is going on, encourage peole to subsribe to the list.

need to invite Councillors ( Action Bart)

See Allan's comment in chat as well

3. Paul: meeting last Thursday 

Rationale for data : dashboard well recevied 

Extrapolate raw data

During call, calls performance 

Some fields were incomplete, Fields were incomplete

Historical data will be used. IANA staff will do 

All thresholds need to be filled in

Not an SLE, but IANA telling what was captured. SLE call needs to happen.

SHAve SLE's not been agreed? Need for DT-A to meet and 

Not all has filled in.

SLE's being too demanding?

Parameters need to follow the norms, not being out of reach.

NTIA did capture time to fulfill there role in process. Timing not captured in proposed text.

Document is incomplete, in area's where IAAN has not taken into NTIA role?

How close are we in closing htis.

Some of the processes are still blank. 

Document far from complete

In some earea's agreement ( quite a few) agreement with Istanbul document.

But still far complete

Martin: struggling if we are almost there or not?

Is there an explanation from IANA staff?

How close we are? Depends on when IANA wil complete their task.

Not significant

Process needs to be completed before transition 

CSC will refine SLA, at the date of transition 

Difference between ccTLD and gTLD operate the same system.

Need to investigate if there is a rationale

Lise: SLE need to be finalised before the transition.

From this call, on ensuring to make this happen

CWG need to highlight expectation

PTI Bylaws and contract

Document from Sidley

Bylaws out for public comment

Instead of chaning bylaws art of publi comments

Naming agreemtn two documents

·  Naming function agreement, drafted and send to CWG , disucssed upcoming Thursday

·  Service contract, only headings, 

Sidley comment on agreement in CWG

Sidley advise on Annex C, to include only on naming Function Agreement ( difficult to change)

Becasue of timg total package difficult

Bylaws, agreement and service should be viewed a total package

Paul: need to read last iteration. Sidley 

Service agreement is locked.

Concern: cultural reason to include in Bylaws.

From a pragmatic, legal point it may not be necessary, but in some cultural environments is may be very advisable/necessary

Matter of Optics.

As to mission statement it should focus on global community and not just on ICANN. 

Martin: Not chance to look at document

Concern in bylaws, when new operator if and choosen in future. Looking at last  iteration.

Both in Bylaws and contract

Implmentation concern around 

NTIA contract. 

Clarification around way C 8.2 is a concern

Wider issue then in NTIA contract 

Two consequences: 

- Not a carry-over from CWG porposal

Need for hymn sheet, 

IRP

Non-discussion,

Next meeting: 10-11 August Staff to send out Doodle poll.