Re: [ccnso-council] FW: CCWG-Accountability WG proposal for a Limited Scope of the ATRT3 Review - reminder
Feb. 3, 2017
4:22 a.m.
Dear Katrina, No objection from me Regards, Abdalla Omari On Jan 31, 2017 12:12 PM, Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Sorry I did not send this to you earlier – hoped to have some more clarity around Operating Standard but apparently we won’t have the document in place any time soon which means that with ATRT3 we’ll need to use the same method as with SSR2 and RDS (e.g., decide what to do on the go) .
Suggest we support CCWG-Accountability’s proposal to limit the scope of the ATRT3 review. Any objections?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
]{atrina
From: Bernard Turcotte [mailto:turcotte.bernard@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 10:41 PM To: Katrina Satak
3392
Age (days ago)
3392
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
ceo