[REVIEW DRAFT] Letter to ICANN Board | change of Article 10 and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws
Dear Councillors, I am following up on the correspondence below. The ccNSO now needs to formally submit a request to the ICANN Board to change the Article 10 and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws, to enable IDN ccTLD Managers to become members of the ccNSO. A draft letter to the ICANN Board is available for your review. Go to https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FIWNclZcgUc3RoNWkX2QkdyqXEvRXRHliK3penUt... Since time is of essence in this process, please review the proposed draft by Wednesday, 8 September 2021 (23:59 UTC). Your comments or suggestions are welcome. Background This change request is the result of an extensive consultation with the ccNSO members. It started with the second ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLDs, which was adopted by the membership in 2013. Additional community consultations took place: in October 2019 - on separating the Bylaw change effort and the launch of the 4th ccNSO PDP on the selection of IDN ccTLD strings – followed by consultations as part of the ccNSO Statement process on the proposed changes of Article 10 and Annex B ( https://ccnso.icann.org/en/about/ccnso-to-icann-legal-18feb21-en.pdf). Recently ICANN legal provided a response to the ccNSO Statement on the proposed changes to Article 10 of the ICANN Bylaws. Following ICANN Legal’s questions and suggested changes, additional consultations were held in August 2021 regarding the latest proposed changes to Article 10 and Annex B: Council was consulted from 13-19 August, and the ccNSO membership was consulted 20-27 August. Some community members submitted comments, which did not result in further edits to the latest proposed Bylaw changes to Article 10 and Annex B, as per the rationale previously circulated (see email below). Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Reply to: Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> Date: Monday, 30 August 2021 at 20:37 To: aclu <aclu@twnic.tw> Cc: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Feedback on Proposed Amendmen ts to Article 10 and Annex B Dear Ai-chin and All Thank you for your kind reminder. I agree with you, this process has taken a long time to get to where we are and it is not the first time this definition has been presented to the community. It was already included in the proposed overall policy for the inclusion of IDNccTLD Managers in the ccNSO selection of IDN ccTLD strings (ccPDP2) as adopted by the ccNSO in 2013, and submitted to the Board. The definition was confirmed again in the October 2019 consultation resulting in the request to change Article 10 and Annex B of the Bylaws and in the ccNSO Statement on the first set of questions from ICANN Legal more recently. Additionally, in the discussions with respect to the ccPDP4 (de-)selection of IDN ccTLD strings, the term ‘Territory’ will be proposed and is defined in the same manner. Therefore, I propose that we relay the comments received to ICANN Legal and keep the current definition. I have cleaned the Google Doc [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuM...> and everyone can send comments or suggestions until tomorrow at 22:00 UTC. Best regards, Alejandra -- [Image removed by sender. Photograph] Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt P: +502 23688565 E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt<mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt [gt]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.gt/__;!!PtGJab4!t3qAKlD8jYCUyQLrGybPbj...> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 6:29 AM aclu <aclu@twnic.tw<mailto:aclu@twnic.tw>> wrote: Dear Alejandra, I agree with your proposal, but I think the main purpose of the amendment of article 10 is to allow IDN ccTLD to be ccNSO members. (the draft team's main jobs). I’m afraid that if we raise the issues about the "country" and " territory," that might take more time to pass the amendment. regards ai-chin -----Original message----- From:Alejandra Reynoso via Ccnso-council<ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> To:ccNSO Council<ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:05:30 Subject: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Feedback on Proposed Amendments to Article 10 and Annex B Dear Councillors Following the ccNSO Members' consultation regarding the Proposed Amendments to Article 10 and Annex B. It is time to report back to ICANN Legal with our findings, suggestions and/or edits. I have drafted an email response in the following Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuMDuHg4y0xl4SwyKG3DexPivAkyUo... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuM...> Please review it and feel free to edit and add comments until next Tuesday 31/August, so it can be finalized by Wednesday 1/September. Have a great weekend! :) Best regards, Alejandra -- [Image removed by sender. Photograph] Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt P: +502 23688565 E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt<mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt [gt]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.gt/__;!!PtGJab4!t3qAKlD8jYCUyQLrGybPbj...> _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Joke, all I’m fine with the letter itself but I failed to find the Annex mentioned in the letter Irina From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Joke Braeken via Ccnso-council Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 2:56 PM To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Letter to ICANN Board | change of Article 10 and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws Dear Councillors, I am following up on the correspondence below. The ccNSO now needs to formally submit a request to the ICANN Board to change the Article 10 and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws, to enable IDN ccTLD Managers to become members of the ccNSO. A draft letter to the ICANN Board is available for your review. Go to https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FIWNclZcgUc3RoNWkX2QkdyqXEvRXRHliK3penUt... Since time is of essence in this process, please review the proposed draft by Wednesday, 8 September 2021 (23:59 UTC). Your comments or suggestions are welcome. Background This change request is the result of an extensive consultation with the ccNSO members. It started with the second ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLDs, which was adopted by the membership in 2013. Additional community consultations took place: in October 2019 - on separating the Bylaw change effort and the launch of the 4th ccNSO PDP on the selection of IDN ccTLD strings – followed by consultations as part of the ccNSO Statement process on the proposed changes of Article 10 and Annex B ( https://ccnso.icann.org/en/about/ccnso-to-icann-legal-18feb21-en.pdf). Recently ICANN legal provided a response to the ccNSO Statement on the proposed changes to Article 10 of the ICANN Bylaws. Following ICANN Legal’s questions and suggested changes, additional consultations were held in August 2021 regarding the latest proposed changes to Article 10 and Annex B: Council was consulted from 13-19 August, and the ccNSO membership was consulted 20-27 August. Some community members submitted comments, which did not result in further edits to the latest proposed Bylaw changes to Article 10 and Annex B, as per the rationale previously circulated (see email below). Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org <mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> > Reply to: Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt <mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> > Date: Monday, 30 August 2021 at 20:37 To: aclu <aclu@twnic.tw <mailto:aclu@twnic.tw> > Cc: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Feedback on Proposed Amendmen ts to Article 10 and Annex B Dear Ai-chin and All Thank you for your kind reminder. I agree with you, this process has taken a long time to get to where we are and it is not the first time this definition has been presented to the community. It was already included in the proposed overall policy for the inclusion of IDNccTLD Managers in the ccNSO selection of IDN ccTLD strings (ccPDP2) as adopted by the ccNSO in 2013, and submitted to the Board. The definition was confirmed again in the October 2019 consultation resulting in the request to change Article 10 and Annex B of the Bylaws and in the ccNSO Statement on the first set of questions from ICANN Legal more recently. Additionally, in the discussions with respect to the ccPDP4 (de-)selection of IDN ccTLD strings, the term ‘Territory’ will be proposed and is defined in the same manner. Therefore, I propose that we relay the comments received to ICANN Legal and keep the current definition. I have cleaned the Google Doc [docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuM...> and everyone can send comments or suggestions until tomorrow at 22:00 UTC. Best regards, Alejandra -- Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt P: +502 23688565 E: <mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.gt/__;!!PtGJab4!t3qAKlD8jYCUyQLrGybPbj...> www.gt [gt] On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 6:29 AM aclu <aclu@twnic.tw <mailto:aclu@twnic.tw> > wrote: Dear Alejandra, I agree with your proposal, but I think the main purpose of the amendment of article 10 is to allow IDN ccTLD to be ccNSO members. (the draft team's main jobs). I’m afraid that if we raise the issues about the "country" and " territory," that might take more time to pass the amendment. regards ai-chin -----Original message----- From:Alejandra Reynoso via Ccnso-council<ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> > To:ccNSO Council<ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:05:30 Subject: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Feedback on Proposed Amendments to Article 10 and Annex B Dear Councillors Following the ccNSO Members' consultation regarding the Proposed Amendments to Article 10 and Annex B. It is time to report back to ICANN Legal with our findings, suggestions and/or edits. I have drafted an email response in the following Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuMDuHg4y0xl4SwyKG3DexPivAkyUo... [docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuM...> Please review it and feel free to edit and add comments until next Tuesday 31/August, so it can be finalized by Wednesday 1/September. Have a great weekend! :) Best regards, Alejandra -- Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt P: +502 23688565 E: <mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.gt/__;!!PtGJab4!t3qAKlD8jYCUyQLrGybPbj...> www.gt [gt] _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Irina, Thank you very much. The annex is located here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YxJY7k8lflkBzTLfY9AcDHpsrUIib2BdChWeCJ-q... This is the version of the proposed bylaws text as shared previously by Alejandra to the council mailing list and ICANN legal, but without redlines. The cover letter and annex will be sent as a PDF by Alejandra, following the deadline for comments by Council. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org From: Irina Danelia <i.danelia@cctld.ru> Date: Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 11:04 To: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org>, ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Letter to ICANN Board | change of Article 10 and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws Dear Joke, all I’m fine with the letter itself but I failed to find the Annex mentioned in the letter Irina From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Joke Braeken via Ccnso-council Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 2:56 PM To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Letter to ICANN Board | change of Article 10 and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws Dear Councillors, I am following up on the correspondence below. The ccNSO now needs to formally submit a request to the ICANN Board to change the Article 10 and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws, to enable IDN ccTLD Managers to become members of the ccNSO. A draft letter to the ICANN Board is available for your review. Go to https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FIWNclZcgUc3RoNWkX2QkdyqXEvRXRHliK3penUt... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1FIWNclZcgUc3R...> Since time is of essence in this process, please review the proposed draft by Wednesday, 8 September 2021 (23:59 UTC). Your comments or suggestions are welcome. Background This change request is the result of an extensive consultation with the ccNSO members. It started with the second ccNSO Policy Development Process on IDN ccTLDs, which was adopted by the membership in 2013. Additional community consultations took place: in October 2019 - on separating the Bylaw change effort and the launch of the 4th ccNSO PDP on the selection of IDN ccTLD strings – followed by consultations as part of the ccNSO Statement process on the proposed changes of Article 10 and Annex B ( https://ccnso.icann.org/en/about/ccnso-to-icann-legal-18feb21-en.pdf [ccnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ccnso.icann.org/en/about/ccnso-to-icann-l...>). Recently ICANN legal provided a response to the ccNSO Statement on the proposed changes to Article 10 of the ICANN Bylaws. Following ICANN Legal’s questions and suggested changes, additional consultations were held in August 2021 regarding the latest proposed changes to Article 10 and Annex B: Council was consulted from 13-19 August, and the ccNSO membership was consulted 20-27 August. Some community members submitted comments, which did not result in further edits to the latest proposed Bylaw changes to Article 10 and Annex B, as per the rationale previously circulated (see email below). Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Reply to: Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt<mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt>> Date: Monday, 30 August 2021 at 20:37 To: aclu <aclu@twnic.tw<mailto:aclu@twnic.tw>> Cc: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Feedback on Proposed Amendmen ts to Article 10 and Annex B Dear Ai-chin and All Thank you for your kind reminder. I agree with you, this process has taken a long time to get to where we are and it is not the first time this definition has been presented to the community. It was already included in the proposed overall policy for the inclusion of IDNccTLD Managers in the ccNSO selection of IDN ccTLD strings (ccPDP2) as adopted by the ccNSO in 2013, and submitted to the Board. The definition was confirmed again in the October 2019 consultation resulting in the request to change Article 10 and Annex B of the Bylaws and in the ccNSO Statement on the first set of questions from ICANN Legal more recently. Additionally, in the discussions with respect to the ccPDP4 (de-)selection of IDN ccTLD strings, the term ‘Territory’ will be proposed and is defined in the same manner. Therefore, I propose that we relay the comments received to ICANN Legal and keep the current definition. I have cleaned the Google Doc [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuM...> and everyone can send comments or suggestions until tomorrow at 22:00 UTC. Best regards, Alejandra -- [Image removed by sender. Photograph] Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt P: +502 23688565 E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt<mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt [gt]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.gt/__;!!PtGJab4!t3qAKlD8jYCUyQLrGybPbj...> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 6:29 AM aclu <aclu@twnic.tw<mailto:aclu@twnic.tw>> wrote: Dear Alejandra, I agree with your proposal, but I think the main purpose of the amendment of article 10 is to allow IDN ccTLD to be ccNSO members. (the draft team's main jobs). I’m afraid that if we raise the issues about the "country" and " territory," that might take more time to pass the amendment. regards ai-chin -----Original message----- From:Alejandra Reynoso via Ccnso-council<ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> To:ccNSO Council<ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:05:30 Subject: [ccnso-council] [REVIEW DRAFT] Feedback on Proposed Amendments to Article 10 and Annex B Dear Councillors Following the ccNSO Members' consultation regarding the Proposed Amendments to Article 10 and Annex B. It is time to report back to ICANN Legal with our findings, suggestions and/or edits. I have drafted an email response in the following Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuMDuHg4y0xl4SwyKG3DexPivAkyUo... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/12zZZuHmyatXuM...> Please review it and feel free to edit and add comments until next Tuesday 31/August, so it can be finalized by Wednesday 1/September. Have a great weekend! :) Best regards, Alejandra -- [Image removed by sender. Photograph] Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt P: +502 23688565 E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt<mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt [gt]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.gt/__;!!PtGJab4!t3qAKlD8jYCUyQLrGybPbj...> _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (2)
-
Irina Danelia -
Joke Braeken