ccNSO Council Statement Operating Standards
Dear all, Per Council call 18 January, could you be so kind to provide your comments, if any, by 25 January 2018. Goal is to provide a final version by 29 January, which would need to be adopted by 1 February and then submitted. Kind regards, Bart
Thanks for all the efforts by GRC and all who have been engaged. I think the draft is very well-conceived. I have one minor comment on the draft. The bottom of page-2 goes "Operating Standard should be in place before starting a Specific Review2, not to be legalistic, but to ensure: 1. the basic methodology to run reviews is in place before they start, and, 2. the expectations of all stakeholder with respect to the Reviews are aligned." How about changing the order of 1 and 2? I think the reverse order may make readers feel more natural because "expectations of stakeholders" should be considered first before defining "review methodology". Hiro On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:46:20 +0000 Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Per Council call 18 January, could you be so kind to provide your comments, if any, by 25 January 2018.
Goal is to provide a final version by 29 January, which would need to be adopted by 1 February and then submitted.
Kind regards,
Bart
participants (2)
-
Bart Boswinkel -
HiroHOTTA