I agree with Peter. The Triage Recommendation is certainly something I agree with. But I am not sure that I agree that it is ALL we should be doing. I submit thta the ccNSO needs to formally consult our membership AND (since no one else will take on the role) non-member ccTLDs managers. And this is all going to going to be a challenge, in terms of time and input. Nigel PS: In passing, I am extremely unhappy with the Co-Chair's decision to guillotine the public consultation exercise. It is unnecessary and counter-productive to legitimacy. On 12/01/2015 03:37 PM, Peter Van Roste wrote:

(cc’ing Mathieu Weill)

Gabi,

I understood that the stakeholders are encouraged to give feedback/support via “their” chartering organisations of the ccWG.

Shouldn’t this be reflected in the recommendation? If so, how will the ccNSO handle and compile this input?

Thanks!

Peter

*From:*owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Gabriella Schittek *Sent:* 01 December 2015 15:37 *To:* ccnso-council@icann.org *Subject:* [ccnso-council] 46-2015: CCWG-Accountability - Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

Dear Councillors,

Please, let me know by Thursday, 3 December, in case you do not agree with Triage suggestion 46-2015: CCWG-Accountability - Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations.

Thanks,

Gabi

==

*Topic: *46-2015: CCWG-Accountability - Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

*Originator: *CCWG-Accountability

*Summary of request: *The CCWG-Accountability seeks community feedback on its Draft Proposal, which contains following 12 recommendations:

Recommendation #1: Establishing an Empowered Community for Enforcing Community Powers Recommendation #2: Empowering the community through consensus: engage, escalate, enforce Recommendation #3: Redefining ICANN's Bylaws as 'Standard Bylaws' and 'Fundamental Bylaws' Recommendation #4: Ensuring community involvement in ICANN decision-making: seven new Community Powers Recommendation #5: Changing aspects of ICANN's Mission, Commitments and Core Values Recommendation #6: Reaffirming ICANN's Commitment to respect internationally recognized Human Rights as it carries out its mission Recommendation #7: Strengthening ICANN's Independent Review Process Recommendation #8: Fortifying ICANN's Request for Reconsideration Process Recommendation #9: Incorporation of the Affirmation of Commitments Recommendation #10: Enhancing the accountability of Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees Recommendation #11: Board obligations with regards to Governmental Advisory Committee Advice (Stress Test 18) Recommendation #12: Committing to further accountability work in Work Stream 2

https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-201...

*Date received: *1 December 2015

*Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: *21 December 2015

*Recommended action, if any: *Send to community for information; ccNSO Chair to actively encourage community input.

*Expertise needed, if any:* Legal, managerial

*Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: *High