Bart, et. al., I am happy with it. Best Regards, /Stephen From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccNSO-Council@icann.org> Reply-To: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> Date: Monday, November 7, 2022 at 04:21 To: "ccnso-members@icann.org" <ccnso-members@icann.org>, "cctldcommunity@cctld-managers.org" <cctldcommunity@cctld-managers.org> Cc: "ccNSO-Council@icann.org" <ccNSO-Council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Freindly reminder: Public comment on Initial Report 2nd CSC Effectivenes Review Dear all, Friendly reminder: If you have any comments, concerns or do NOT support the proposed submission please let us know ( preferably using the list) by 15 November 2022, 23.59 UTC, On behalf of Irina Danelia and Molehe Wesi Bart Boswinkel, ccNSO secretariat From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> Date: Monday, 31 October 2022 at 14:54 To: "ccnso-members@icann.org" <ccnso-members@icann.org>, "cctldcommunity@cctld-managers.org" <cctldcommunity@cctld-managers.org> Cc: "ccNSO-Council@icann.org" <ccNSO-Council@icann.org> Subject: Public comment on Initial Report 2nd CSC Effectivenes Review Dear All, Recently the 2nd Customer Standing Committee (CSC) review team posted its Initial Report to seek public comment and feed-back (see: https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/initial-report-on-the-sec...) Due to the importance of the CSC in monitoring the performance of the IANA Naming Services for the benefit of all direct customers – which includes all ccTLDs - the ccNSO Council decided to submit a ccNSO response. This is a submission that is supported by both Council and ccNSO members. The Council tasked a small team ( Irina Danelia and Molehe Wesi) to draft a response. Included is a draft that has already bene reviewed by the ccNSO Council and the team is now seeking your comments and support. Main points of the draft submission: * The ccNSO supports the view of the review team that the CSC is effective and limited role should NOT be expanded * The ccNSO also supports the view that the CSC is best positioned to review regularly the IANA Naming Service Level Agreements. These SLAs should remain to be relevant, up-to date and adequate for the benefit of all ccTLDs and be used as a mechanism to avoid the emergence of issues, which could have been avoided if the SLAs were up-to-date reviewed. If you have any comments, concerns or do NOT support the proposed submission please let us know ( preferably using the list) by 15 November 2022, 23.59 UTC, On behalf of the Irina and Molehe, Bart Boswinkel, ccNSO secretariat