Reminder: PLEASE VOTE: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board
Dear all, As friendly reminder, to date we have received the votes of 8 of the 18 Councillors. Could you be so kind to cast your vote please, Thank you, kind regards, Bart Dear Councillors, As Ching has voted against the resolution, now according to our internals rules we need to vote as only by majority vote we can adopt the response to the Board’s letter prepared by the working party and that is already adopted by SSAC. May I ask the Councillors to pro-actively express your position? Dear Secretariat, please count the votes and publish the fact of voting (not the actual vote!) on our wiki space. Kind regards, ]{atrina From: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Date: Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 19:58 To: <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board Dear Councillors, On our last call Hiro informed us that the EPSRP working party concluded its work and the SSAC was in the process to decide whether to adopt the paper prepared by the working party. Hiro also indicated that he would submit the final paper to chair once adopted by SSAC. I am pleased to inform you that Hiro has formally sent me the paper after he and I were informed that SSAC has adopted the document (included) “as is”. So now it is up to us. According to our internal rules (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf) and as agreed at our last call on 24 August we will take an email decision. I therefore propose the following resolution: Proposed Resolution Background In its letter dated 24 April 2017, the ICANN Board of Directors noted divergent views of the SSAC and ccNSO with respect to the following topics: Interpretation of RFC 6912; On similarity findings, and On mitigation measures. The Board suggested the ccNSO and SSAC collaboratively arrive at conclusions on these 3 issues and requested a joint briefing to further the Board’s understanding of the topic. The ccNSO and SSAC agreed to set up a working party with two members from each group tasked to develop a common position on the 3 topics, if feasible. Both the ccNSO Council and SSAC would approve the document according to their own rules and procedures and then would send and present it to the Board. The Chair of the ccNSO and ccNSO members on the working party were informed that SSAC has adopted the Joint ccNSO SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. Decision. The ccNSO Council suports the observations and recommendations of the working party and adopts the Joint ccNSO-SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. The ccNSO Council particularly welcomes the proposed changes to section 5.6.3 of the current version of the Fast Track Implementation Plan (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05... ). The ccNSO Council request its Chair to inform the Chair of SSAC accordingly, and jointly submit the Joint Response. The ccNSO Council thanks and congratulates the members of the working party: Suzanne Woolf (SSAC), Jeff Bedser (SSAC), Hiro Hotta (ccNSO), Wafa Dahmani (ccNSO), for their work on the paper and for finding a common position. According to our rules this resolution will be considered adopted if none of us raises objections by 8 September 2017 23.59 UTC or, in case at least one of us raises an objection by a majority vote. So, please let your voice be heard on this topic, preferably as soon as possible but no later than 8 September 23.59 UTC. Thank you! Kindest regards, ]{atrina _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
In favour. On 05/09/17 14:21, Bart Boswinkel wrote:
Dear all,
As friendly reminder, to date we have received the votes of 8 of the 18 Councillors. Could you be so kind to cast your vote please,
Thank you, kind regards,
Bart
Dear Councillors,
As Ching has voted against the resolution, now according to our internals rules we need to vote as only by majority vote we can adopt the response to the Board’s letter prepared by the working party and that is already adopted by SSAC.
May I ask the Councillors to pro-actively express your position? Dear Secretariat, please count the votes and publish the fact of voting (not the actual vote!) on our wiki space.
Kind regards,
]{atrina
*From: *<ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> *Date: *Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 19:58 *To: *<ccnso-council@icann.org> *Subject: *[ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board
Dear Councillors,
On our last call Hiro informed us that the EPSRP working party concluded its work and the SSAC was in the process to decide whether to adopt the paper prepared by the working party. Hiro also indicated that he would submit the final paper to chair once adopted by SSAC.
I am pleased to inform you that Hiro has formally sent me the paper after he and I were informed that SSAC has adopted the document (included) “as is”. So now it is up to us.
According to our internal rules (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf) and as agreed at our last call on 24 August we will take an email decision. I therefore propose the following resolution:
Proposed Resolution
Background
In its letter dated 24 April 2017, the ICANN Board of Directors noted divergent views of the SSAC and ccNSO with respect to the following topics: Interpretation of RFC 6912; On similarity findings, and On mitigation measures. The Board suggested the ccNSO and SSAC collaboratively arrive at conclusions on these 3 issues and requested a joint briefing to further the Board’s understanding of the topic. The ccNSO and SSAC agreed to set up a working party with two members from each group tasked to develop a common position on the 3 topics, if feasible. Both the ccNSO Council and SSAC would approve the document according to their own rules and procedures and then would send and present it to the Board. The Chair of the ccNSO and ccNSO members on the working party were informed that SSAC has adopted the Joint ccNSO SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party.
Decision.
The ccNSO Council suports the observations and recommendations of the working party and adopts the Joint ccNSO-SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. The ccNSO Council particularly welcomes the proposed changes to section 5.6.3 of the current version of the Fast Track Implementation Plan (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05... ). The ccNSO Council request its Chair to inform the Chair of SSAC accordingly, and jointly submit the Joint Response. The ccNSO Council thanks and congratulates the members of the working party: Suzanne Woolf (SSAC), Jeff Bedser (SSAC), Hiro Hotta (ccNSO), Wafa Dahmani (ccNSO), for their work on the paper and for finding a common position.
According to our rules this resolution will be considered adopted if none of us raises objections by 8 September 2017 23.59 UTC or, in case at least one of us raises an objection by a majority vote.
So, please let your voice be heard on this topic, preferably as soon as possible but no later than 8 September 23.59 UTC.
Thank you!
Kindest regards,
]{atrina
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
In favour. Regards M Margarita Valdés Cortés, MBM-UAI Legal & Business Manager NIC Chile - University of Chile www.nic.cl +56229407734
El 05-09-2017, a las 11:06, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> escribió:
In favour.
On 05/09/17 14:21, Bart Boswinkel wrote: Dear all,
As friendly reminder, to date we have received the votes of 8 of the 18 Councillors. Could you be so kind to cast your vote please,
Thank you, kind regards,
Bart
Dear Councillors,
As Ching has voted against the resolution, now according to our internals rules we need to vote as only by majority vote we can adopt the response to the Board’s letter prepared by the working party and that is already adopted by SSAC.
May I ask the Councillors to pro-actively express your position? Dear Secretariat, please count the votes and publish the fact of voting (not the actual vote!) on our wiki space.
Kind regards,
]{atrina
*From: *<ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> *Date: *Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 19:58 *To: *<ccnso-council@icann.org> *Subject: *[ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board
Dear Councillors,
On our last call Hiro informed us that the EPSRP working party concluded its work and the SSAC was in the process to decide whether to adopt the paper prepared by the working party. Hiro also indicated that he would submit the final paper to chair once adopted by SSAC.
I am pleased to inform you that Hiro has formally sent me the paper after he and I were informed that SSAC has adopted the document (included) “as is”. So now it is up to us.
According to our internal rules (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf) and as agreed at our last call on 24 August we will take an email decision. I therefore propose the following resolution:
Proposed Resolution
Background
In its letter dated 24 April 2017, the ICANN Board of Directors noted divergent views of the SSAC and ccNSO with respect to the following topics: Interpretation of RFC 6912; On similarity findings, and On mitigation measures. The Board suggested the ccNSO and SSAC collaboratively arrive at conclusions on these 3 issues and requested a joint briefing to further the Board’s understanding of the topic. The ccNSO and SSAC agreed to set up a working party with two members from each group tasked to develop a common position on the 3 topics, if feasible. Both the ccNSO Council and SSAC would approve the document according to their own rules and procedures and then would send and present it to the Board. The Chair of the ccNSO and ccNSO members on the working party were informed that SSAC has adopted the Joint ccNSO SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party.
Decision.
The ccNSO Council suports the observations and recommendations of the working party and adopts the Joint ccNSO-SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. The ccNSO Council particularly welcomes the proposed changes to section 5.6.3 of the current version of the Fast Track Implementation Plan (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05... ). The ccNSO Council request its Chair to inform the Chair of SSAC accordingly, and jointly submit the Joint Response. The ccNSO Council thanks and congratulates the members of the working party: Suzanne Woolf (SSAC), Jeff Bedser (SSAC), Hiro Hotta (ccNSO), Wafa Dahmani (ccNSO), for their work on the paper and for finding a common position.
According to our rules this resolution will be considered adopted if none of us raises objections by 8 September 2017 23.59 UTC or, in case at least one of us raises an objection by a majority vote.
So, please let your voice be heard on this topic, preferably as soon as possible but no later than 8 September 23.59 UTC.
Thank you!
Kindest regards,
]{atrina
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
Dear all, I am in favor. Christelle Vaval Cabinet Salès 62, rue Geffrard (angle rue Chavannes) HT 6140, Pétion-Ville, Haiti Tél: (509) 2815-1500 Fax: (509) 2256-5107 Email: <mailto:cvaval@cabinetsales.com> cvaval@cabinetsales.com Pensez-y avant d’imprimer. | Think before printing. AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ - Ce message est pour l'usage exclusif du (des) destinataire(s) mentionné(s) ci-dessus. Il peut contenir de l'information privilégiée, propriétaire, confidentielle et/ou dispensée de divulgation par la loi. Si vous n'êtes pas un destinataire nommé ou si vous l'avez reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur et l'effacer sans le copier ni le divulguer à quiconque, ni n'en faire aucun usage. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This communication is for the exclusive use of the above-named recipient(s). It may contain information that is privileged, proprietary, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure by law. If you are not the intended recipient or have received it in error, immediately notify the sender and delete it without copying it, disclosing it to anyone or making any use of it. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD - Este mensaje es para el uso exclusivo del (de los) destinatario(s) indicados más arriba y puede tener información privilegiada, propietaria, confidencial y/o legalmente no divulgable. Si usted no es un destinatario de este mensaje o lo recibe por error, se le pide avisar inmediatamente al remitente y eliminar el mensaje sin copiarlo, divulgarlo o hacer cualquier otro uso del mismo. From: ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 9:21 AM To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>; ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: [ccnso-council] Reminder: PLEASE VOTE: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board Dear all, As friendly reminder, to date we have received the votes of 8 of the 18 Councillors. Could you be so kind to cast your vote please, Thank you, kind regards, Bart Dear Councillors, As Ching has voted against the resolution, now according to our internals rules we need to vote as only by majority vote we can adopt the response to the Board’s letter prepared by the working party and that is already adopted by SSAC. May I ask the Councillors to pro-actively express your position? Dear Secretariat, please count the votes and publish the fact of voting (not the actual vote!) on our wiki space. Kind regards, ]{atrina From: < <mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Katrina Sataki < <mailto:katrina@nic.lv> katrina@nic.lv> Date: Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 19:58 To: < <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board Dear Councillors, On our last call Hiro informed us that the EPSRP working party concluded its work and the SSAC was in the process to decide whether to adopt the paper prepared by the working party. Hiro also indicated that he would submit the final paper to chair once adopted by SSAC. I am pleased to inform you that Hiro has formally sent me the paper after he and I were informed that SSAC has adopted the document (included) “as is”. So now it is up to us. According to our internal rules (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf) and as agreed at our last call on 24 August we will take an email decision. I therefore propose the following resolution: Proposed Resolution Background In its letter dated 24 April 2017, the ICANN Board of Directors noted divergent views of the SSAC and ccNSO with respect to the following topics: Interpretation of RFC 6912; On similarity findings, and On mitigation measures. The Board suggested the ccNSO and SSAC collaboratively arrive at conclusions on these 3 issues and requested a joint briefing to further the Board’s understanding of the topic. The ccNSO and SSAC agreed to set up a working party with two members from each group tasked to develop a common position on the 3 topics, if feasible. Both the ccNSO Council and SSAC would approve the document according to their own rules and procedures and then would send and present it to the Board. The Chair of the ccNSO and ccNSO members on the working party were informed that SSAC has adopted the Joint ccNSO SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. Decision. The ccNSO Council suports the observations and recommendations of the working party and adopts the Joint ccNSO-SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. The ccNSO Council particularly welcomes the proposed changes to section 5.6.3 of the current version of the Fast Track Implementation Plan (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05... ). The ccNSO Council request its Chair to inform the Chair of SSAC accordingly, and jointly submit the Joint Response. The ccNSO Council thanks and congratulates the members of the working party: Suzanne Woolf (SSAC), Jeff Bedser (SSAC), Hiro Hotta (ccNSO), Wafa Dahmani (ccNSO), for their work on the paper and for finding a common position. According to our rules this resolution will be considered adopted if none of us raises objections by 8 September 2017 23.59 UTC or, in case at least one of us raises an objection by a majority vote. So, please let your voice be heard on this topic, preferably as soon as possible but no later than 8 September 23.59 UTC. Thank you! Kindest regards, ]{atrina _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list <mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> Ccnso-council@icann.org <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
Dear all, This is the final reminder to vote: to date we have received the votes of 15 of the 18 Councillors. Could you be so kind to cast your vote on the decision as proposed by Katrina (see below)? Thank you, kind regards, Bart Dear Councillors, As Ching has voted against the resolution, now according to our internals rules we need to vote as only by majority vote we can adopt the response to the Board’s letter prepared by the working party and that is already adopted by SSAC. May I ask the Councillors to pro-actively express your position? Dear Secretariat, please count the votes and publish the fact of voting (not the actual vote!) on our wiki space. Kind regards, ]{atrina From: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Date: Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 19:58 To: <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board Dear Councillors, On our last call Hiro informed us that the EPSRP working party concluded its work and the SSAC was in the process to decide whether to adopt the paper prepared by the working party. Hiro also indicated that he would submit the final paper to chair once adopted by SSAC. I am pleased to inform you that Hiro has formally sent me the paper after he and I were informed that SSAC has adopted the document (included) “as is”. So now it is up to us. According to our internal rules (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf) and as agreed at our last call on 24 August we will take an email decision. I therefore propose the following resolution: Proposed Resolution Background In its letter dated 24 April 2017, the ICANN Board of Directors noted divergent views of the SSAC and ccNSO with respect to the following topics: Interpretation of RFC 6912; On similarity findings, and On mitigation measures. The Board suggested the ccNSO and SSAC collaboratively arrive at conclusions on these 3 issues and requested a joint briefing to further the Board’s understanding of the topic. The ccNSO and SSAC agreed to set up a working party with two members from each group tasked to develop a common position on the 3 topics, if feasible. Both the ccNSO Council and SSAC would approve the document according to their own rules and procedures and then would send and present it to the Board. The Chair of the ccNSO and ccNSO members on the working party were informed that SSAC has adopted the Joint ccNSO SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. Decision. The ccNSO Council suports the observations and recommendations of the working party and adopts the Joint ccNSO-SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. The ccNSO Council particularly welcomes the proposed changes to section 5.6.3 of the current version of the Fast Track Implementation Plan (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05... ). The ccNSO Council request its Chair to inform the Chair of SSAC accordingly, and jointly submit the Joint Response. The ccNSO Council thanks and congratulates the members of the working party: Suzanne Woolf (SSAC), Jeff Bedser (SSAC), Hiro Hotta (ccNSO), Wafa Dahmani (ccNSO), for their work on the paper and for finding a common position. According to our rules this resolution will be considered adopted if none of us raises objections by 8 September 2017 23.59 UTC or, in case at least one of us raises an objection by a majority vote. So, please let your voice be heard on this topic, preferably as soon as possible but no later than 8 September 23.59 UTC. Thank you! Kindest regards, ]{atrina _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
Dear All, i am in favor. Souleymane Best regard 2017-09-07 8:03 UTC, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>:
Dear all,
This is the final reminder to vote: to date we have received the votes of 15 of the 18 Councillors. Could you be so kind to cast your vote on the decision as proposed by Katrina (see below)?
Thank you, kind regards,
Bart
Dear Councillors,
As Ching has voted against the resolution, now according to our internals rules we need to vote as only by majority vote we can adopt the response to the Board’s letter prepared by the working party and that is already adopted by SSAC.
May I ask the Councillors to pro-actively express your position? Dear Secretariat, please count the votes and publish the fact of voting (not the actual vote!) on our wiki space.
Kind regards,
]{atrina
From: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Date: Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 19:58 To: <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board
Dear Councillors,
On our last call Hiro informed us that the EPSRP working party concluded its work and the SSAC was in the process to decide whether to adopt the paper prepared by the working party. Hiro also indicated that he would submit the final paper to chair once adopted by SSAC.
I am pleased to inform you that Hiro has formally sent me the paper after he and I were informed that SSAC has adopted the document (included) “as is”. So now it is up to us.
According to our internal rules (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf) and as agreed at our last call on 24 August we will take an email decision. I therefore propose the following resolution:
Proposed Resolution
Background
In its letter dated 24 April 2017, the ICANN Board of Directors noted divergent views of the SSAC and ccNSO with respect to the following topics: Interpretation of RFC 6912; On similarity findings, and On mitigation measures. The Board suggested the ccNSO and SSAC collaboratively arrive at conclusions on these 3 issues and requested a joint briefing to further the Board’s understanding of the topic. The ccNSO and SSAC agreed to set up a working party with two members from each group tasked to develop a common position on the 3 topics, if feasible. Both the ccNSO Council and SSAC would approve the document according to their own rules and procedures and then would send and present it to the Board. The Chair of the ccNSO and ccNSO members on the working party were informed that SSAC has adopted the Joint ccNSO SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party.
Decision.
The ccNSO Council suports the observations and recommendations of the working party and adopts the Joint ccNSO-SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. The ccNSO Council particularly welcomes the proposed changes to section 5.6.3 of the current version of the Fast Track Implementation Plan (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05... ). The ccNSO Council request its Chair to inform the Chair of SSAC accordingly, and jointly submit the Joint Response. The ccNSO Council thanks and congratulates the members of the working party: Suzanne Woolf (SSAC), Jeff Bedser (SSAC), Hiro Hotta (ccNSO), Wafa Dahmani (ccNSO), for their work on the paper and for finding a common position.
According to our rules this resolution will be considered adopted if none of us raises objections by 8 September 2017 23.59 UTC or, in case at least one of us raises an objection by a majority vote.
So, please let your voice be heard on this topic, preferably as soon as possible but no later than 8 September 23.59 UTC.
Thank you!
Kindest regards,
]{atrina
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
Dear Bart, I am in favor. Thank you Kind regards, Abdalla Omari. Chief Executive Officer
On Sep 5, 2017, at 4:21 PM, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all, As friendly reminder, to date we have received the votes of 8 of the 18 Councillors. Could you be so kind to cast your vote please, Thank you, kind regards, Bart
Dear Councillors,
As Ching has voted against the resolution, now according to our internals rules we need to vote as only by majority vote we can adopt the response to the Board’s letter prepared by the working party and that is already adopted by SSAC.
May I ask the Councillors to pro-actively express your position? Dear Secretariat, please count the votes and publish the fact of voting (not the actual vote!) on our wiki space.
Kind regards,
]{atrina
From: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv <mailto:katrina@nic.lv>> Date: Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 19:58 To: <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board
Dear Councillors,
On our last call Hiro informed us that the EPSRP working party concluded its work and the SSAC was in the process to decide whether to adopt the paper prepared by the working party. Hiro also indicated that he would submit the final paper to chair once adopted by SSAC.
I am pleased to inform you that Hiro has formally sent me the paper after he and I were informed that SSAC has adopted the document (included) “as is”. So now it is up to us.
According to our internal rules (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf <https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf>) and as agreed at our last call on 24 August we will take an email decision. I therefore propose the following resolution:
Proposed Resolution
Background In its letter dated 24 April 2017, the ICANN Board of Directors noted divergent views of the SSAC and ccNSO with respect to the following topics: Interpretation of RFC 6912; On similarity findings, and On mitigation measures. The Board suggested the ccNSO and SSAC collaboratively arrive at conclusions on these 3 issues and requested a joint briefing to further the Board’s understanding of the topic. The ccNSO and SSAC agreed to set up a working party with two members from each group tasked to develop a common position on the 3 topics, if feasible. Both the ccNSO Council and SSAC would approve the document according to their own rules and procedures and then would send and present it to the Board. The Chair of the ccNSO and ccNSO members on the working party were informed that SSAC has adopted the Joint ccNSO SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party.
Decision. The ccNSO Council suports the observations and recommendations of the working party and adopts the Joint ccNSO-SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. The ccNSO Council particularly welcomes the proposed changes to section 5.6.3 of the current version of the Fast Track Implementation Plan (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05... <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05...> ). The ccNSO Council request its Chair to inform the Chair of SSAC accordingly, and jointly submit the Joint Response. The ccNSO Council thanks and congratulates the members of the working party: Suzanne Woolf (SSAC), Jeff Bedser (SSAC), Hiro Hotta (ccNSO), Wafa Dahmani (ccNSO), for their work on the paper and for finding a common position.
According to our rules this resolution will be considered adopted if none of us raises objections by 8 September 2017 23.59 UTC or, in case at least one of us raises an objection by a majority vote.
So, please let your voice be heard on this topic, preferably as soon as possible but no later than 8 September 23.59 UTC.
Thank you!
Kindest regards,
]{atrina _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council>_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council>
I vote in favour. Byron From: ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: September-05-17 9:21 AM To: Katrina Sataki; ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: [ccnso-council] Reminder: PLEASE VOTE: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board Dear all, As friendly reminder, to date we have received the votes of 8 of the 18 Councillors. Could you be so kind to cast your vote please, Thank you, kind regards, Bart Dear Councillors, As Ching has voted against the resolution, now according to our internals rules we need to vote as only by majority vote we can adopt the response to the Board’s letter prepared by the working party and that is already adopted by SSAC. May I ask the Councillors to pro-actively express your position? Dear Secretariat, please count the votes and publish the fact of voting (not the actual vote!) on our wiki space. Kind regards, ]{atrina From: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>> Date: Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 19:58 To: <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: Joint ccNSO-SSAC response to the ICANN Board Dear Councillors, On our last call Hiro informed us that the EPSRP working party concluded its work and the SSAC was in the process to decide whether to adopt the paper prepared by the working party. Hiro also indicated that he would submit the final paper to chair once adopted by SSAC. I am pleased to inform you that Hiro has formally sent me the paper after he and I were informed that SSAC has adopted the document (included) “as is”. So now it is up to us. According to our internal rules (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guidelines-council-practices-09feb17-en.pdf) and as agreed at our last call on 24 August we will take an email decision. I therefore propose the following resolution: Proposed Resolution Background In its letter dated 24 April 2017, the ICANN Board of Directors noted divergent views of the SSAC and ccNSO with respect to the following topics: Interpretation of RFC 6912; On similarity findings, and On mitigation measures. The Board suggested the ccNSO and SSAC collaboratively arrive at conclusions on these 3 issues and requested a joint briefing to further the Board’s understanding of the topic. The ccNSO and SSAC agreed to set up a working party with two members from each group tasked to develop a common position on the 3 topics, if feasible. Both the ccNSO Council and SSAC would approve the document according to their own rules and procedures and then would send and present it to the Board. The Chair of the ccNSO and ccNSO members on the working party were informed that SSAC has adopted the Joint ccNSO SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. Decision. The ccNSO Council suports the observations and recommendations of the working party and adopts the Joint ccNSO-SSAC Response to ICANN Board on EPSRP as proposed by the working party. The ccNSO Council particularly welcomes the proposed changes to section 5.6.3 of the current version of the Fast Track Implementation Plan (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-05... ). The ccNSO Council request its Chair to inform the Chair of SSAC accordingly, and jointly submit the Joint Response. The ccNSO Council thanks and congratulates the members of the working party: Suzanne Woolf (SSAC), Jeff Bedser (SSAC), Hiro Hotta (ccNSO), Wafa Dahmani (ccNSO), for their work on the paper and for finding a common position. According to our rules this resolution will be considered adopted if none of us raises objections by 8 September 2017 23.59 UTC or, in case at least one of us raises an objection by a majority vote. So, please let your voice be heard on this topic, preferably as soon as possible but no later than 8 September 23.59 UTC. Thank you! Kindest regards, ]{atrina _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
participants (7)
-
Abdalla -
Bart Boswinkel -
Byron Holland -
cvaval＠cabinetsales.com -
Margarita Valdes -
Nigel Roberts -
Souleymane Oumtanaga