DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations
Dear Councillors, As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013. Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short. The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following: 1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs 2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks. 3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon) To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO. Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on! Thanks! Gabi Originator: ATRT 2 Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues. Date received: 22 October 2013 Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013 Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires. Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO. Expertise needed, if any: Various Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013 Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013 Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
I agree with this approach and I am willing to take the lead on Section 11 J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006 Office: + 1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / becky.burr@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary. Follow Neustar: [http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture.png] Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc> [http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture%20(1)(1).png] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349> [http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture%20(2).png] Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustarinc> ________________________________ The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Gabriella Schittek Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:49 AM To: 'ccnso-council@icann.org' Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations Dear Councillors, As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013. Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short. The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following: 1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs 2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks. 3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon) To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO. Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on! Thanks! Gabi Originator: ATRT 2 Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues. Date received: 22 October 2013 Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013 Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires. Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO. Expertise needed, if any: Various Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013 Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013 Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
Dear Councillors, So far, I have only received one volunteer for the list of ATRT 2 topics below (thank you, Becky!) - I would be grateful if more Councillors could take the lead (if you agree with the proposal, of course). Let me know as soon as possible! Thanks! Gabi From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Wednesday 30 October 2013 14:49 To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations
Dear Councillors,
As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013.
Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short.
The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following:
1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs
2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks.
3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon)
To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on!
Thanks!
Gabi
Originator: ATRT 2
Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues.
Date received: 22 October 2013
Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013
Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires.
Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Expertise needed, if any: Various
Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013
Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013
Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
I agree with the proposal and (with the SOPWG) can do 12 Best regards, Roelof Meijer CEO Sent through my mobile device SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | P.O. Box 5022 | 6802 EA | Arnhem | The Netherlands | T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 | M +31 (0)6 11 39 57 75 | roelof.meijer@sidn.nl<mailto:roelof.meijer@sidn.nl> | www.sidn.nl<http://www.sidn.nl> Op 31 okt. 2013 om 13:53 heeft "Gabriella Schittek" <gabriella.schittek@icann.org<mailto:gabriella.schittek@icann.org>> het volgende geschreven: Dear Councillors, So far, I have only received one volunteer for the list of ATRT 2 topics below (thank you, Becky!) - I would be grateful if more Councillors could take the lead (if you agree with the proposal, of course). Let me know as soon as possible! Thanks! Gabi From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org<mailto:gabriella.schittek@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday 30 October 2013 14:49 To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:'ccnso-council@icann.org>'" <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations Dear Councillors, As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013. Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short. The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following: 1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs 2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks. 3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon) To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO. Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on! Thanks! Gabi Originator: ATRT 2 Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues. Date received: 22 October 2013 Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013 Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires. Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO. Expertise needed, if any: Various Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013 Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013 Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
Dear Gabi, I would help to do "Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes)". Best, Hong On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Gabriella Schittek < gabriella.schittek@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councillors,
So far, I have only received one volunteer for the list of ATRT 2 topics below (thank you, Becky!) - I would be grateful if more Councillors could take the lead (if you agree with the proposal, of course).
Let me know as soon as possible!
Thanks!
Gabi
From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Wednesday 30 October 2013 14:49 To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations
Dear Councillors,
As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013.
Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short.
The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following:
1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs
2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks.
3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon)
To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
*Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on!*
Thanks!
Gabi
*Originator:* ATRT 2 *Summary of request:* The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues. *Date received:* 22 October 2013 *Last day for Comments/input/response, if any:* 22 November 2013 *Recommended action, if any: * Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires.
Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
*Expertise needed, if any:* Various *Date of submission to Council: *30 October 2013 *Last date of Council decision:* 1 November 2013 *Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs*: Middle/high
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
I'm willing to lead on Recommendation 1-3. As an alternative, I can also look at Recommendation 12 although I think one of the Finance & SOP WG members (especially the Chairs) should lead this one. Regards, Vika From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Thursday 31 October 2013 2:51 PM To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Reminder: DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations Dear Councillors, So far, I have only received one volunteer for the list of ATRT 2 topics below (thank you, Becky!) - I would be grateful if more Councillors could take the lead (if you agree with the proposal, of course). Let me know as soon as possible! Thanks! Gabi From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Wednesday 30 October 2013 14:49 To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations
Dear Councillors,
As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013.
Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short.
The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following:
1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs
2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks.
3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon)
To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on!
Thanks!
Gabi
Originator: ATRT 2
Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues.
Date received: 22 October 2013
Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013
Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires.
Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Expertise needed, if any: Various
Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013
Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013
Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
I can lead on Recommendation 4. - regards, - Young-eum. Young-eum Lee Dept. of Media Arts & Sciences <http://mas.knou.ac.kr/>, Korea National Open University <http://www.knou.ac.kr/> Dept. of Media Arts and Visual Contents <http://macgrad.knou.ac.kr/>, KNOU Grad School <http://grad.knou.ac.kr/> ICANN <http://www.icann.org/> ccNSO <http://ccnso.icann.org/> Council member<http://ccnso.icann.org/council-members.htm> KISA <http://www.kisa.or.kr/main.jsp> board member<http://www.kisa.or.kr/disclosure/voluntary_02_03.jsp> Vice President, Korean Association for Broadcasting & Telecommunication Studies <http://www.kabs.or.kr/> Chairman, 7th Daum Open User Committee <http://blog.daum.net/openuser> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Vika Mpisane <vika@zadna.org.za> wrote:
I'm willing to lead on Recommendation 1-3. As an alternative, I can also look at Recommendation 12 although I think one of the Finance & SOP WG members (especially the Chairs) should lead this one.
Regards, Vika
From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Thursday 31 October 2013 2:51 PM To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Reminder: DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations
Dear Councillors,
So far, I have only received one volunteer for the list of ATRT 2 topics below (thank you, Becky!) - I would be grateful if more Councillors could take the lead (if you agree with the proposal, of course).
Let me know as soon as possible!
Thanks!
Gabi
From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Wednesday 30 October 2013 14:49 To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations
Dear Councillors,
As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013.
Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short.
The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following:
1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs
2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks.
3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon)
To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
*Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on!*
Thanks!
Gabi
*Originator:* ATRT 2 *Summary of request:* The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues. *Date received:* 22 October 2013 *Last day for Comments/input/response, if any:* 22 November 2013 *Recommended action, if any: * Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires.
Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
*Expertise needed, if any:* Various *Date of submission to Council: *30 October 2013 *Last date of Council decision:* 1 November 2013 *Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs*: Middle/high
Hi Gabi, I agree with this way forward. Happy to help on 1-3, where I have had some informative experiences. Kind regards, Lesley Lesley Cowley, OBE CEO Nominet Minerva House Edmund Halley Road Oxford Science Park Oxford, OX4 4DQ UK Tel: +44-(0)-1865-332211 http://www.nominet.org.uk/ Twitter: @lesleycowley From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org<mailto:gabriella.schittek@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, 30 October 2013 13:49 To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations Dear Councillors, As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013. Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short. The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following: 1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs 2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks. 3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon) To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO. Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on! Thanks! Gabi Originator: ATRT 2 Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues. Date received: 22 October 2013 Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013 Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires. Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO. Expertise needed, if any: Various Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013 Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013 Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
I agree on the proposed way and am happy to help Section/Recommendation 8. Hiro On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 06:49:26 -0700 Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councillors,
As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013.
Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short.
The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following:
1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs
2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks.
3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon)
To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on!
Thanks!
Gabi
Originator: ATRT 2
Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues.
Date received: 22 October 2013
Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013
Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires.
Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Expertise needed, if any: Various
Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013
Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013
Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
Dear Councillors, Many thanks to all of you who volunteered to take a lead on one of the ATRT 2 topics! The topics have been covered as follows: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board Lesley Cowley & Vika Mpisane * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level - YoungEum Lee * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation Katrina Sataki * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes Hong Xue * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recommendations Becky Burr * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency Roelof Meijer Only two topics were left out: Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments Not covered Section /recommendation 10: Assessment of ATRT1 Recommendations 18, 19, and 22 - Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO (see http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/draft-recommendations-15oct13- en.pdf) Not covered Should anyone feel that they could cover any of these topics, please, let me know by the end of today (4 November). Tomorrow, I will send out an email to the community, looking for volunteers to bring input to each of the sections where we have a lead person. I will then forward the names of the volunteers to each of the leading persons and will ask you to then coordinate the communication with the volunteers. Kind regards, Gabi From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Wednesday 30 October 2013 14:49 To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations
Dear Councillors,
As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013.
Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short.
The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following:
1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs
2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks.
3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon)
To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on!
Thanks!
Gabi
Originator: ATRT 2
Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues.
Date received: 22 October 2013
Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013
Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires.
Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Expertise needed, if any: Various
Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013
Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013
Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
Gabi, I think I raised my hand to Section/Recommendation 8 on Saturday. So, please add me on Section/Recommendation 8, if needed. Hiro On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 03:25:04 -0800 Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councillors,
Many thanks to all of you who volunteered to take a lead on one of the ATRT 2 topics!
The topics have been covered as follows: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board - Lesley Cowley & Vika Mpisane * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level - Young-Eum Lee * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation - Katrina Sataki * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes - Hong Xue * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recommendations - Becky Burr * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency - Roelof Meijer Only two topics were left out:
Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments - Not covered Section /recommendation 10: Assessment of ATRT1 Recommendations 18, 19, and 22 - Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO (see http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/draft-recommendations-15oct13- en.pdf) - Not covered
Should anyone feel that they could cover any of these topics, please, let me know by the end of today (4 November). Tomorrow, I will send out an email to the community, looking for volunteers to bring input to each of the sections where we have a lead person. I will then forward the names of the volunteers to each of the leading persons and will ask you to then coordinate the communication with the volunteers.
Kind regards,
Gabi
From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Wednesday 30 October 2013 14:49 To: "'ccnso-council@icann.org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] DECISION NEEDED: (Triage 17-2013) ATRT 2 Recommendations
Dear Councillors,
As you may know, the ATRT 2 has published a report + has listed a number of recommendations, which they wish to receive input to by 22 November 2013.
Whilst it is an important document, it is also massive and the recommendations many - and the time frame to reply to it is very short.
The Triage group has therefore been thinking of how to most efficiently gather input from the Council and community and is suggesting following:
1) Extract those topics that are of interest to the ccTLDs
2) Get Councillors to volunteer to focus and take the lead on one of the topics during this week - their role would be to coordinate questions/remarks.
3) Make a call for Volunteers from the community to prepare input (which can be questions and/or comments posted by email either before the Buenos Aires Meeting, or during the Buenos Aires Meeting - we have scheduled a session with the ATRT 2 team on Tuesday afternoon)
To point 1 - The topics have already been extracted:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Please, let me know if you agree on this way forward by the end of Friday, 1 November - AND - if you agree - which topic you could take the lead on!
Thanks!
Gabi
Originator: ATRT 2
Summary of request: The ATRT 2 is requesting the community to deliver input to their Draft Report and Recommendations (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-21oct13-en.htm), covering a broad range of issues.
Date received: 22 October 2013
Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 22 November 2013
Recommended action, if any: Extract relevant topics; ask Councillors to take lead on one topic each, involve Community in providing feedback to the ATRT on the different sets of recommendations of interest either per email or during meeting in Buenos Aires.
Executive summary sections, which are of interest to the ccNSO and need to be covered:
* Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recomendations * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency * Section /recommendation 10: Although focused on GNSO PDP may have some impact on ccNSO.
Expertise needed, if any: Various
Date of submission to Council: 30 October 2013
Last date of Council decision: 1 November 2013
Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Middle/high
Dear Councillors, Unfortunately, the call for volunteers to the outside community to cover ATRT2 topics didn't bring any feedback, so there are only Councillors (+1 Regional Organisation manager) that have volunteered. The list of volunteers looks as follows: * Section/recomendation 1-3 on quality of the Board Lesley Cowley, Vika Mpisane * Section/Recommendation 4: mechanism for SO/AC consultation on executive and administrative issues to be addressed at Board level - YoungEum Lee * Section/Recommendation 7: explore mechanisms to improve public comment through adjusted time allotments Sokol Haxhiu, Barrack Otieno, Souleymane Oumtanaga, Jordi Iparraguirre * Section/Recommendation 8: capacity of language services to increase participation Katrina Sataki, Hiro Hotta, Jordi Iparraguirre * Section/Recommendation 9, and it sub recommendations ( consideration of decision-making inputs and appeal processes Hong Xue * Section/Recommendation 11: effectiveness of Review Process and its sub-recommendations Becky Burr * Section/Recommendation 12: Financial Accountability and Transparency Roelof Meijer Please, could those who have volunteered start to prepare and those who have more than one volunteer in their group contact each other for cooperation. Thanks! Gabi
participants (8)
-
Burr, Becky -
Gabriella Schittek -
HiroHOTTA -
Hong Xue -
Lesley Cowley -
Roelof Meijer -
Vika Mpisane -
Young-eum Lee