Re: [ccnso-council] Fwd: [Gnso-sc-budget] Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC]
Dear Philippe, As you may know, since 2008, the ccNSO has the Strategic and Operational Planning Standing Committee (SOPC), https://ccnso.icann.org/en/workinggroups/sopiwg.htm, formerly known as SOP WG. They regularly submit comments and meet with Xavier and his team. I am sure that both groups would benefit from information/experience exchange. Giovanni, the chair of the SOPC, currently is on holiday. Next week he will be back and will be able to address your question more constructively. Maybe both groups can meet in Barcelona, for example, SCBO could join the SOPC meeting and discussion? Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of <philippe.fouquart@orange.com> Date: Tuesday, 14 August 2018 at 23:28 To: "ccnso-council@icann org" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Fwd: [Gnso-sc-budget] Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC] Dear ccNSO council, The Standing Committee on Budget and Operations established by the GNSO council is looking into its own future after a bit less than a year of existence and one of the questions is whether there would be benefit in having the ccNSO being involved or liaised with somehow. Your views would be welcome. Regards, Philippe -------- Message d'origine -------- De : Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Date : 30/07/2018 23:24 (GMT+01:00) À : mail@berrycobb.com Cc : gnso-sc-budget@icann.org Objet : [Gnso-sc-budget] Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC] Hi, all- Firstly, thanks to Berry for this summary and for preparing a first draft of this report. On our call today we thought it prudent to take the questions in Section 1.4 back to our respective Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies for feedback. (I have copied and pasted the questions below, for easy reference.) Could you please consult with your part of the community, and bring any comments back to our mailing list by Monday, 13 August? We can then look over all of the comments and based upon your feedback I will draft up some common recommendations for your review with a view to submitting these, once finalised, to the GNSO Council. Our next call will be on Monday, 20 August and I hope we can spend this call wordsmithing those recommendations. Once the language is a bit more final, we should still have another two weeks left to accept edits or comments on our mailing list, ahead of the document submission deadline for the Council’s September meeting. Please let me know if you have any concerns regarding this path forward. Thanks! Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ______________________________ Questions to Consider In reviewing the SCBO’s activity, lessons learned, and potential changes to its charter, the following questions should be considered: Should the SCBO continue to exist? Does the charter need to be amended? If so, how? Was there adequate representation from the Council? Was participation from SG/C subject matter experts who were not Council members helpful? Should the Council submit comments without objection or create a motion for adoption? Should proposed comments be more precise? Should collaboration with the CCNSO be established? Was collaboration with ICANN’s Finance team useful and are changes required should the SCBO continue? How do we better understand when the GNSO Council should be making comments vs. comments submitted from SGs/Cs and avoid overlap or competing positions? On 30 Jul 2018, at 15:46, mail@berrycobb.com wrote: Hi All, Please find attached the next version of the SCBO After Action Report. The action from SCBO members and SMEs is take the questions back to their respective groups to solicit input and suggestions for converting the questions into statements and/or observations. In parallel, Phillipe will collaborate with the CCNSO about a liaison relationship between the two groups. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb GNSO Policy Consultant @berrycobb From: Gnso-sc-budget [mailto:gnso-sc-budget-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of mail@berrycobb.com Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2018 11:20 To: gnso-sc-budget@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-sc-budget] Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC Hi All, Please find below our agenda for the 30 July 2018 SCBO call at 13:00 UTC. The call is scheduled for 60 minutes. 1) Administrative Matters a. SOIs 2) Review draft SCBO After Action Report 3) AOB / Next meeting I attached a draft of the After Action Report for your review prior to the meeting. Track changes are enabled should you have any suggested changes. In chatting with Council leadership, consideration of the SCBO report will occur in September. Therefore, we need to have this report completed by 17 September 2018 for the Motions and Documents deadline. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com @berrycobb <gnso-SCBO-after-action-report-v0.2.docx> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
Dear Katrina, Philippe, I fully support the option of having a meeting at the next ICANN Barcelona. Happy to further liaise and work on it. Best, Giovanni Giovanni Seppia External Relations Manager EURid Woluwelaan 150 1831 Diegem - Belgium TEL: +32 (0) 2 401 2750 MOB:+39 335 8141733 giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu<mailto:giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu> http://www.eurid.eu<http://www.eurid.eu/> Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: 15 August 2018 17:38 To: philippe.fouquart@orange.com; ccnso-council@icann org <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Fwd: [Gnso-sc-budget] Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC] Dear Philippe, As you may know, since 2008, the ccNSO has the Strategic and Operational Planning Standing Committee (SOPC), https://ccnso.icann.org/en/workinggroups/sopiwg.htm, formerly known as SOP WG. They regularly submit comments and meet with Xavier and his team. I am sure that both groups would benefit from information/experience exchange. Giovanni, the chair of the SOPC, currently is on holiday. Next week he will be back and will be able to address your question more constructively. Maybe both groups can meet in Barcelona, for example, SCBO could join the SOPC meeting and discussion? Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of <philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday, 14 August 2018 at 23:28 To: "ccnso-council@icann org" <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] Fwd: [Gnso-sc-budget] Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC] Dear ccNSO council, The Standing Committee on Budget and Operations established by the GNSO council is looking into its own future after a bit less than a year of existence and one of the questions is whether there would be benefit in having the ccNSO being involved or liaised with somehow. Your views would be welcome. Regards, Philippe -------- Message d'origine -------- De : Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> Date : 30/07/2018 23:24 (GMT+01:00) À : mail@berrycobb.com<mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> Cc : gnso-sc-budget@icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget@icann.org> Objet : [Gnso-sc-budget] Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC] Hi, all- Firstly, thanks to Berry for this summary and for preparing a first draft of this report. On our call today we thought it prudent to take the questions in Section 1.4 back to our respective Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies for feedback. (I have copied and pasted the questions below, for easy reference.) Could you please consult with your part of the community, and bring any comments back to our mailing list by Monday, 13 August? We can then look over all of the comments and based upon your feedback I will draft up some common recommendations for your review with a view to submitting these, once finalised, to the GNSO Council. Our next call will be on Monday, 20 August and I hope we can spend this call wordsmithing those recommendations. Once the language is a bit more final, we should still have another two weeks left to accept edits or comments on our mailing list, ahead of the document submission deadline for the Council’s September meeting. Please let me know if you have any concerns regarding this path forward. Thanks! Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ______________________________ Questions to Consider In reviewing the SCBO’s activity, lessons learned, and potential changes to its charter, the following questions should be considered: * Should the SCBO continue to exist? * Does the charter need to be amended? If so, how? * Was there adequate representation from the Council? * Was participation from SG/C subject matter experts who were not Council members helpful? * Should the Council submit comments without objection or create a motion for adoption? * Should proposed comments be more precise? * Should collaboration with the CCNSO be established? * Was collaboration with ICANN’s Finance team useful and are changes required should the SCBO continue? * How do we better understand when the GNSO Council should be making comments vs. comments submitted from SGs/Cs and avoid overlap or competing positions? On 30 Jul 2018, at 15:46, mail@berrycobb.com<mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> wrote: Hi All, Please find attached the next version of the SCBO After Action Report. The action from SCBO members and SMEs is take the questions back to their respective groups to solicit input and suggestions for converting the questions into statements and/or observations. In parallel, Phillipe will collaborate with the CCNSO about a liaison relationship between the two groups. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb GNSO Policy Consultant @berrycobb From: Gnso-sc-budget [mailto:gnso-sc-budget-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of mail@berrycobb.com<mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2018 11:20 To: gnso-sc-budget@icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-sc-budget] Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC Hi All, Please find below our agenda for the 30 July 2018 SCBO call at 13:00 UTC. The call is scheduled for 60 minutes. 1) Administrative Matters a. SOIs 2) Review draft SCBO After Action Report 3) AOB / Next meeting I attached a draft of the After Action Report for your review prior to the meeting. Track changes are enabled should you have any suggested changes. In chatting with Council leadership, consideration of the SCBO report will occur in September. Therefore, we need to have this report completed by 17 September 2018 for the Motions and Documents deadline. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com<mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> @berrycobb <gnso-SCBO-after-action-report-v0.2.docx> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council Disclaimer: This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer https://eurid.eu/en/other-infomation/privacy-policy
participants (2)
-
Giovanni Seppia -
Katrina Sataki