Dear Councillors, In order to document all incoming requests and to ensure that the ccNSO Council makes timely and deliberate decisions on them, incoming requests for input are addressed via triage recommendations. Please find the latest recommendation by the Triage Committee below. * It refers to the email sent by Katrina to the council mailing list on Friday, April 05, 2019, with the following subject: Should blogs ask for community feedback? * Link to draft letter to Göran regarding standing panellists: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O9NGDIv-UGqCtANMvesgR6T9mn1lLtd2XqzQsSV8maw/edit<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1O9NGDIv-2DUGqCtANMvesgR6T9mn1lLtd2XqzQsSV8maw_edit&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=HyTT2ymvadmiQcmo6B088sWOukGjEbibHJ64u5rMiME&m=6r6JEoPjfpIMcao6xTBsJeONWnh0_2B51urHTIM_Ra8&s=_c43NQd-ephrrc9N8FRV2_EpQBbQoDvewBYjlr2AHG4&e=> If you do not agree with the recommendation, kindly let me know by Friday, 12 April 2019, 23:59 UTC. Thank you. Number: 21-2019 Topic: Independent Review Process Standing Panel – Call to Action Request from: ICANN Org Summary: As we work collectively to complete the full implementation of the updated Independent Review Process (IRP), ICANN organization seeks community inputs on the process for the selection of a standing panel to hear IRPs. There are still open questions on how ICANN’s Supporting Organizations (SOs) and Advisory Committees (ACs) will coordinate their participation in the standing panel selection process. As a way to move this process along, ICANN org has published a series of questions designed to help resolve the pending issues. Close date: 15 April 2019 Read more: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/independent-review-process-standing-panel-call-to-action<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_news_blog_independent-2Dreview-2Dprocess-2Dstanding-2Dpanel-2Dcall-2Dto-2Daction&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=HyTT2ymvadmiQcmo6B088sWOukGjEbibHJ64u5rMiME&m=G4guJwgSrZ8gj_iAvgHCnr_JBG0VAu4fRpL4SSQJ2zQ&s=QD5lXJFbn9Lz-tzohW5pIyHGR85I4C0QRXrULZnxYdQ&e=> Recommended action: Based on its discussions during a meeting on Monday 1 April, GRC is preparing a draft response for approval by the ccNSO Council: for future requests, the ccNSO Council chair will stress with relevant ICANN staff that appropriate channels should be used to communicate requests for input by SO/ACs. Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: medium Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org