formal appointment additional members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC).
Dear Councillors, A number of additional candidates recently volunteered to join the IGLC. Please find below the draft resolution, presented to you for an online decision. Kindly provide me with your input by the end of Friday, 19 July 2019, 23:59 UTC, in case you do not agree with the proposed resolution. Appointment member For decision formal appointment members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Draft Resolution The ccNSO Council approves membership to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC) for the following candidates: * Souleymane Oumtanaga (.ci) * Mustafa Sheik (.so) * Andrey Romanov (.ru) The secretariat is requested to take all other necessary steps to include them as a member of the IGLC, including informing the IGLC chair and ensuring that the candidates have signed the Data Consent Form. Thank you. Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org
In principle I’ve no objections, but this committee is now getting quite large, and I’m a bit concerned that will impact its effectiveness. Of course it’s great to get as much engagement and inputs from as many people as possible, and also there’s great geo and linguistic diversity. Is there any precedent for size of committees, or do we usually just happily admit as many candidates as may be interested? From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Joke Braeken Sent: 16 July 2019 16:27 To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] formal appointment additional members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Dear Councillors, A number of additional candidates recently volunteered to join the IGLC. Please find below the draft resolution, presented to you for an online decision. Kindly provide me with your input by the end of Friday, 19 July 2019, 23:59 UTC, in case you do not agree with the proposed resolution. Appointment member For decision formal appointment members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Draft Resolution The ccNSO Council approves membership to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC) for the following candidates: * Souleymane Oumtanaga (.ci) * Mustafa Sheik (.so) * Andrey Romanov (.ru) The secretariat is requested to take all other necessary steps to include them as a member of the IGLC, including informing the IGLC chair and ensuring that the candidates have signed the Data Consent Form. Thank you. Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org
Hi Nick,
Is there any precedent for size of committees, or do we usually just happily admit as many candidates as may be interested?
If there are no prescribed limits (e.g., like in case of CCWG on Auction Proceeds or CSC), we appoint everyone who is interested. However, I see why you are concerned about the group getting too large. I think that every WG should annually ask members to reconfirm their willingness to participate in the work of the WG. I believe that some groups, e.g. SOPC, MPC, already do it. It’s a good way to ensure that people don’t stay on a WG or Committee just out of a habit. Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> > On Behalf Of Joke Braeken Sent: 16 July 2019 16:27 To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> > Subject: [ccnso-council] formal appointment additional members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Dear Councillors, A number of additional candidates recently volunteered to join the IGLC. Please find below the draft resolution, presented to you for an online decision. Kindly provide me with your input by the end of Friday, 19 July 2019, 23:59 UTC, in case you do not agree with the proposed resolution. Appointment member For decision formal appointment members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Draft Resolution The ccNSO Council approves membership to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC) for the following candidates: * Souleymane Oumtanaga (.ci) * Mustafa Sheik (.so) * Andrey Romanov (.ru) The secretariat is requested to take all other necessary steps to include them as a member of the IGLC, including informing the IGLC chair and ensuring that the candidates have signed the Data Consent Form. Thank you. Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor <mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> joke.braeken@icann.org Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: <https://twitter.com/ccNSO> https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/> https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ <http://ccnso.icann.org> http://ccnso.icann.org
Thanks very much Katrina for that swift clarification. In that case I am happy to approve the three additional members as proposed. Best wishes Nick From: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Sent: 16 July 2019 17:29 To: Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk>; 'Joke Braeken' <joke.braeken@icann.org>; 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] formal appointment additional members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Hi Nick,
Is there any precedent for size of committees, or do we usually just happily admit as many candidates as may be interested?
If there are no prescribed limits (e.g., like in case of CCWG on Auction Proceeds or CSC), we appoint everyone who is interested. However, I see why you are concerned about the group getting too large. I think that every WG should annually ask members to reconfirm their willingness to participate in the work of the WG. I believe that some groups, e.g. SOPC, MPC, already do it. It’s a good way to ensure that people don’t stay on a WG or Committee just out of a habit. Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Joke Braeken Sent: 16 July 2019 16:27 To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] formal appointment additional members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Dear Councillors, A number of additional candidates recently volunteered to join the IGLC. Please find below the draft resolution, presented to you for an online decision. Kindly provide me with your input by the end of Friday, 19 July 2019, 23:59 UTC, in case you do not agree with the proposed resolution. Appointment member For decision formal appointment members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Draft Resolution The ccNSO Council approves membership to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC) for the following candidates: * Souleymane Oumtanaga (.ci) * Mustafa Sheik (.so) * Andrey Romanov (.ru) The secretariat is requested to take all other necessary steps to include them as a member of the IGLC, including informing the IGLC chair and ensuring that the candidates have signed the Data Consent Form. Thank you. Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org
Sorry just read Katrina’s answer. El El mar, 16 de jul. de 2019 a las 13:58, Nick Wenban-Smith < Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk> escribió:
Thanks very much Katrina for that swift clarification.
In that case I am happy to approve the three additional members as proposed.
Best wishes
Nick
*From:* Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> *Sent:* 16 July 2019 17:29 *To:* Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk>; 'Joke Braeken' < joke.braeken@icann.org>; 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> *Subject:* RE: [ccnso-council] formal appointment additional members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC).
Hi Nick,
Is there any precedent for size of committees, or do we usually just happily admit as many candidates as may be interested?
If there are no prescribed limits (e.g., like in case of CCWG on Auction Proceeds or CSC), we appoint everyone who is interested.
However, I see why you are concerned about the group getting too large. I think that every WG should annually ask members to reconfirm their willingness to participate in the work of the WG. I believe that some groups, e.g. SOPC, MPC, already do it. It’s a good way to ensure that people don’t stay on a WG or Committee just out of a habit.
Kind regards,
]{atrina
*From:* Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Joke Braeken *Sent:* 16 July 2019 16:27 *To:* ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> *Subject:* [ccnso-council] formal appointment additional members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC).
Dear Councillors,
A number of additional candidates recently volunteered to join the IGLC.
Please find below the draft resolution, presented to you for an online decision. Kindly provide me with your input by the end of Friday, 19 July 2019, 23:59 UTC, in case you do not agree with the proposed resolution.
*Appointment member*
*For decision*
formal appointment members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC).
*Draft Resolution*
The ccNSO Council approves membership to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC) for the following candidates:
- Souleymane Oumtanaga (.ci) - Mustafa Sheik (.so) - Andrey Romanov (.ru)
The secretariat is requested to take all other necessary steps to include them as a member of the IGLC, including informing the IGLC chair and ensuring that the candidates have signed the Data Consent Form.
Thank you.
Best regards.
Joke Braeken
ccNSO Policy Advisor
joke.braeken@icann.org
Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO
Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Nick I agree with you. Do we have precedents? Thank you! Best, Laura El El mar, 16 de jul. de 2019 a las 13:02, Nick Wenban-Smith < Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk> escribió:
In principle I’ve no objections, but this committee is now getting quite large, and I’m a bit concerned that will impact its effectiveness.
Of course it’s great to get as much engagement and inputs from as many people as possible, and also there’s great geo and linguistic diversity.
Is there any precedent for size of committees, or do we usually just happily admit as many candidates as may be interested?
*From:* Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Joke Braeken *Sent:* 16 July 2019 16:27 *To:* ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> *Subject:* [ccnso-council] formal appointment additional members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC).
Dear Councillors,
A number of additional candidates recently volunteered to join the IGLC.
Please find below the draft resolution, presented to you for an online decision. Kindly provide me with your input by the end of Friday, 19 July 2019, 23:59 UTC, in case you do not agree with the proposed resolution.
*Appointment member*
*For decision*
formal appointment members to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC).
*Draft Resolution*
The ccNSO Council approves membership to the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC) for the following candidates:
- Souleymane Oumtanaga (.ci) - Mustafa Sheik (.so) - Andrey Romanov (.ru)
The secretariat is requested to take all other necessary steps to include them as a member of the IGLC, including informing the IGLC chair and ensuring that the candidates have signed the Data Consent Form.
Thank you.
Best regards.
Joke Braeken
ccNSO Policy Advisor
joke.braeken@icann.org
Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO
Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (4)
-
Joke Braeken -
Katrina Sataki -
Laura Margolis -
Nick Wenban-Smith