Comments on Geographical Names DAG v.2 - your input needed!!!
Dear all, The ccNSO Geographical Names Working Group has written a comment to the Draft Applicant Guidebook, V.2 - please, find this attached. We need your input on this paper to by Monday, 30th March 2009 latest! Many thanks, Gabi
I support the comments currently written. <just my impression --> no amendment needed> Although judging whether "the applicant INTENDs to do something" is much difficult than judging whther "the applicant DECLAREs to do something", I understand "INTENTION" is the key we need to say here. Hiro On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:50:57 -0700 Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
The ccNSO Geographical Names Working Group has written a comment to the Draft Applicant Guidebook, V.2 - please, find this attached.
We need your input on this paper to by Monday, 30th March 2009 latest!
Many thanks,
Gabi
Dear Gabi, I can't find anything I would want to change. I believe the paper is ready for submission. Thanks. - ramesh - On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:22 PM, HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
I support the comments currently written.
<just my impression --> no amendment needed> Although judging whether "the applicant INTENDs to do something" is much difficult than judging whther "the applicant DECLAREs to do something", I understand "INTENTION" is the key we need to say here.
Hiro
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:50:57 -0700 Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
The ccNSO Geographical Names Working Group has written a comment to the Draft Applicant Guidebook, V.2 - please, find this attached.
We need your input on this paper to by Monday, 30th March 2009 latest!
Many thanks,
Gabi
participants (3)
-
Gabriella Schittek -
HiroHOTTA -
Ramesh Kumar Nadarajah