Dear Eberhard, Nick, Alejandra, and Bruce,

I hope this message finds you all well. Regrettably, I will not be able to attend the meeting in Mumbai in person. However, please rest assured that I will definitely participate in a meeting via Zoom to talk about the PDP.

I fully agree that the ccNSO does not need to hold a formal position on the PDP questions, given the diverse regional, legal, and administrative nature of the ccTLDs. This diversity inherently means that a unified stance is not feasible or necessary.

Looking forward to our zoom meeting.

Best regards,

Diego

From: Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2026 9:48:16 AM
To: Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk>; Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com>; Bruce Tonkin <bruce.tonkin@auda.org.au>; Diego Ernesto Luna Quevedo <dlunaq@mintic.gov.co>
Cc: Dns-techs <dns-techs@na-nic.com.na>; Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org>; ccNSO Leadership <ccnso-leadership@icann.org>; ccNSO Secretariat <ccnsosecretariat@icann.org>; el@lisse.na <el@lisse.na>
Subject: Re: GNSO PDP1

No suele recibir correo electrónico de el@lisse.na. Por qué es esto importante

Nick,

I also think it's not an issue, but given the drama the different Stakeholder Groups in the gNSO seem to be prone to, and the jockeying for the Vice Chair taking place already ;-)-O maybe we should put it on record clearly and early.

greetings, el

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 19, 2026 at 15:40 +0200, Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk>, wrote:

[…]

A short call ahead of Mumbai would be helpful but this is not a contentious question I believe.

[…]