NOTES | PGA WG | 4 March 2025
Welcome by Maria
2.
Administrative matters
a.
SoI
Any updates? None
Fill out the ccNSO Statement of Interest form:
https://forms.gle/79Jw4wSnNhn5W4Z46 . Once processed by the Secretariat, you can check your
SOI here: https://community.icann.org/x/doAFEgRead here the ccNSO SOI Guideline:
https://ccnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/field-attached/ccnso-internal-procedure-general-soi-coi-21sep23-en.pdf
b.
Update Workplan
For discussion during the PGA work session over the weekend
Group might need to meet one or 2 meetings after ICANN82. Report to council
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OOP7lbO9xfoyz09zn1SPBUpEZU5NLmtcgZeyQD-srJM/edit?usp=sharing
3.
First reading updated proposal priorities
Please check the document before the meeting. If you have any comments make observations in suggestion mode.
Proposed priority items for study group - First Reading (for 4 March 2025 PGA-WG
meeting)
Stephen: ccPDP3. ccTLD subject to a retirement effort. But there is no review mechanism in place. Due to board inaction. That is not fair to ccTLDs.
Bart: sth for further discussion.
Peter: i will respond to Stephen in Seattle.
The iana contract is sth we might want to look at.
We need to start somewhere. No optimal order to address this. This looks like low hanging fruit, and contained or scoped problem statement. Nonetheless it would
be good not to pre-empt anything that would be a potential result from the broader scope questions
Bart; what is meant by that?
Peter: since this is low hanging fruit, there is high hanging fruit
Bart: to avoid misunderstanding. The low hanging fruit is only disaster recovery. The first topic is definitely not low hanging fruit. To avoid misunderstanding.
Peter: there was significant confusion on the order in the survey. These are our testing cases. They are rather scoped in a way. The plea is to make sure that we
do not bind ourselves by outcomes that might bite back when we go to the broader issues
Bart: suggest. There is an understanding that - see intro part, groupings of issues - you already see a broader description. Summary of the work done by the group
to date on the mentimeter polling and discussions. Before we do anything, the WG need to be chartered properly. Clear identifiable deliverables to manage the work.
Peter: Council can take that into consideration
Bart: they have to. Otherwise overload.
Green marks.
Prioritisation item on agenda is now completed.
4.
Additional Topics for Gap Analysis?
Bart: see gap suggested by Stephen
No further suggestions.
Bart: we will add it for discussion during the working session in Seattle.
If anybody has additional gaps, please send them to the PGA mailing list
5.
In-person meeting topics:
a.
Final reading prioritization
b.
Additional gaps (added)
c.
What to present to the community?
d.
What to present to the GAC
e.
Consolidated Overview Applicable policies
f.
Next steps
6.
Next meeting
PGA work session
Saturday, 8 March 2025 | 09:00-10:00 local (-8 UTC)
Community update
Tuesday, 11 March | 16:30-17:30 local (UTC -7)
Update GAC
Wednesday, 12 March | 10:30-12:00 local (UTC -7)
Group will meet again post ICANN82, probably resuming end March
7.
AOB
none
8.
Adjourn
Bey all