Hi all

 

*please read and think about this before you travel to Seattle (if you’re travelling)*

 

I wrote the proposal linked below, to give something to agree or push against or amend, after our use of this approach seemed to work well in Istanbul.

 

In brief, I’m proposing that the top two issues for future work should be:

 

The arguments why are in the Google doc.

 

Are you OK with this? Different views? An alternative top one or two issues?

 

Please start the convo on the list. First reading on the call on 4 March. Second reading and finalising at the meeting on Sat in Seattle.

 

Cheers

Jordan

 

 

From: Claudia Ruiz via Ccnso-pgawg <ccnso-pgawg@icann.org>
Sent: Saturday, 1 March 2025 12:19 PM
To: ccnso-pgawg@icann.org
Cc: Claudia Ruiz <claudia.ruiz@icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - [Ccnso-pgawg] Draft Agenda PGA WG 04 March 2025 | PGA-WG Doc – Issues and Analysis for WG

 

Dear all,

 

In preparation for our call Tuesday, 04 March at 20:00 UTC, please take a look at the attached agenda.

 

Also, please take a look at the PGA-WG Doc – Issues and Analysis for WG. At the bottom of the doc is the Proposed priority items for study group – Frist reading, this will be discussed on our call on Tuesday.

 

Thank you.

 

Best regards,

Claudia Ruiz