I uploaded a background document that I was developing to give a high level overview of how we’ve gotten to where we are on the Reconsideration and Independent Review processes. I already had it in progress, so I did not attempt to insert the information
into David’s document, so that we could keep background separate from present state.
It would be helpful to understand the level of detail that you would hope to see regarding the SSR Review and ATRT reviews as part of this document – are we envisioning that we’ll have high level summaries of recommendations, or references to external
documents?
I will build out some of the other sections tomorrow.
I’d also like to get your opinions on how much we should be identifying other items that have an impact on ICANN’s accountability outside of the redress mechanisms. I’m attaching the presentation that was given at ICANN 50 during the accountability session
as a conversation starter for us about what else we think we should include here so that the CCWG can make assessments as to which areas are to be prioritized for attention.