Hello Eberhard,

...

would you be willing to share your "understanding" why you are seeking to introduce ICP-1 into Garnishee-Appellee's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Appendix (USCA Case #14-7193 Document #1573369)

I don't know anything about this - but will ask the ICANN legal team when I get into LA.

...

while at the same time my understanding is that you agreed with ICP-1 being archived (as not ever having been policy)?

I assume you are asking what the status is of the ICP-1 document. Again I will seek advice from staff and other Board members that are more familiar with the topic when I get into LA later this week. Is this part of the CCWG proposal in some way? Regards, Bruce Tonkin