OK. The point I was trying to make clear was that the APPRP would not DO assessments of particular projects, but well may act on the results reported by the Mechanism.
Alan
At 26/08/2019 04:07 PM, Becky Burr wrote:
I am having a little trouble reconciling this:
- The prime function of the APPRP will be to perform an annual review (starting at the end of year 2) of the ongoing operational process including an assessment of approved projects vs auction proceeds goals
and an assessment of the success of funded projects (based on interim and final assessments provided to the APPRP).
with this:
- For avoidance of doubt, the APPRP will focus on the overall operation of the Mechanism and will not evaluate the success of individual funded projects, although the APPRP may take into consideration such evaluations performed by the Mechanism.
In the first bullet, perhaps it would be clearer to say "an assessment of the overall success of the program"?
b
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 3:49 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > wrote:
- Sorry this took so long.
- The revision is attached.
- Note that in the first bullet I have a bracketed sentence about the
- SO/AC Chairs selecting if an SO/AC names more than 2 people. I think
- we can safely omit this and require that an SO/AC not name more than 2.
- Alan_______________________________________________
- Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
- Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
- https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
- _______________________________________________
- By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery
or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.