That's also an arguement for not using a term that has a very specific carefully defined meaning. No matter how much you tell people you are using a different meaning, the base one will be presumed.

Alan
--
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.

On November 22, 2019 9:37:57 PM EST, Sam Lanfranco <sam@lanfranco.net> wrote:

Alan,

We are pretty much on the same page here. The overall text makes it clear that we are not restricting grants (even "baskets" would involve more than one (-: )
My simple solution would be a term in the glossary (or, as you say, a footnote).

Sam

On 11/22/2019 9:30 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
Sam, In my mind, ANY term is likely to have some 
problems, so I agree that we need to pick a term 
but then qualify what we mean. In most cases 
where we use the term, we also qualify or expand 
it with expressions like :under-represented 
countries" or "underserved populations"

As has been pointed, where we are targetting such 
populations, we are also aiming at disadvantaged 
populations that may reside within a higher-income contry.

So pick something, but then with a foot note of 
more formal definition make it clear what we mean.

Also note that we are not RESTRICTING grants to 
such groups but merely targeting them.

Alan


<deleted>