Elliot, can you clarify what you mean by "playing along". 

I am a little challenged by that comment, given the amount of time that I devote to this CCWG. 




From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Elliot Noss <enoss@tucows.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:08 AM
To: CCWG Auction Proceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment proposal
 
I do want you all to know I am still following along. This is all WAY TOO MUCH in my view (both experts on review and this de minimis role for the community wrapped in another convoluted process) but I respect others opinions and efforts.

If others agree with me I would love to hear, just to know I am not alone. I am also not sure if we are now not down to a very small group that is still playing along.

EN

On Aug 28, 2019, at 5:45 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> wrote:

agree with Maureen and Sam. 
cumulative could be read to mean that each project is reviewed. NOT what we are agreeing on. 


_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.