Maybe a googledoc or another tool for editing a document as a group?

+1 and i already suggested Erica to consider using google doc for her compiled version that we are expecting today

-----------------
Arsène Tungali,
about.me/ArseneTungali
+243 993810967
GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo

Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)

On Sep 7, 2017, at 6:22 AM, Sylvia Cadena <sylvia@apnic.net> wrote:

Thanks Daniel. I also follow the core values discussion from the distance.

I just tried to compile comments into a text that puts them in context for a preamble… it will be great if you could try to add your comments there? It is a bit hard to capture the essence of what people are trying to change, so it might be better if we do it as a collective.

Maybe a googledoc or another tool for editing a document as a group?

Regards,

Sylvia

————

** ISIF Asia call for grants proposals and award nominations has been extended until 15 September (midnight UTC) www.isif.asia <http://www.isif.asia/> - Get started and submit your application! **

Sylvia Cadena | sylvia@apnic.net | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | +10 GMT Brisbane, Australia | http://www.apnic.foundation <http://www.apnic.foundation/>


On 7/9/17, 1:56 am, "Daniel Dardailler" <danield@w3.org> wrote:

   BTW, I have meant to mention it for a while, I participate (from a
   distance) in the IGF Dynamic Coalition on Internet Core Values, which
   relates to our Open Internet description.

   It's still work-progress, but you can get a recent listing of those core
   values at

   https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d7pUJzpEBbZPsLLzEaDovlhc4LKAuu8_B4XogIJjG3g/edit




   On 2017-09-06 14:43, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
Hello Sylvia, all

I like the new definition, but I want to come back to the part that
refers to "equally accessible to all people for _all purposes_".

By that core principle, any society where even a few things are
forbidden to promote (online or else, produce or relay), such as
negationism (the idea that the holocaust didn't happen), terrorism
recruitment, etc., would be consider out of the Open Internet.

And more common illegal purposes abound: copying/serving files without
rights, fake news, diffamation, etc., and I'm not sure we want to
reserve the term Open Internet for an ideal world where everybody is
good except for the censors.

Either we have to qualify the "purposes", e.g. "all law-abiding
purposes", and shift the responsibility of openness on those making
laws, or we need to contextualize "equal access" to transport level
neutrality, not looking at content.


On 2017-09-06 03:00, Sylvia Cadena wrote:
Dear all,

I have checked the document that Marika shared with comments from many
of us and incorporated the last ones made on this thread. I hope the
attached document serves to structure a preamble (as Erika suggested)
in a way that reflects the spirit of the CCWG discussions, and our
intent for the auction proceeds funds to make a difference.

Warm regards,

Sylvia

————

** ISIF Asia call for grants proposals and award nominations has been
extended until 15 September (midnight UTC) www.isif.asia [3] - Get
started and submit your application! **

Sylvia Cadena | sylvia@apnic.net | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs
| +10 GMT Brisbane, Australia | http://www.apnic.foundation [4]

FROM: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Judith
Hellerstein <judith@jhellerstein.com>
ORGANIZATION: Hellerstein & Associates
REPLY-TO: Judith Hellerstein <judith@jhellerstein.com>
DATE: Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 2:17 pm
TO: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>
SUBJECT: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated version
open internet definition / description

HI Erika and others,

I like Daniel's summary of Open Internet but we need to also address
the issue of accessibility. If you recall Elliott suggested the
following

An Internet that is equally accessible to all people for all purposes,
and at every level of the stack. At the lower end of the stack, that
means no impediments are placed based on the sender, recipient,
content, application or type of  data being transmitted.

If we could add the concept of accessibility to your definition I
think that would greatly help

I also like Sylvia Cadena's text and hope we can figure out a way to
add this to our definition.

That means no impediments are placed based on the sender, recipient,
content, application or type of data being transmitted.



That means policy and regulation promote, support, facilitate and
guarantee access

That means equality of access at a pragmatic level is ensured by
assuring access at prices affordable to all members of society

That means training is available about how to manage, operate and how
to use the Internet, as well as education in how to use it effectively


That means participation on an equal footing at all levels is
encouraged, specially by those that might be discriminated against

Best,
Judith

_________________________________________________________________________

Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO

Hellerstein & Associates

3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008

Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein

Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517

E-mail: Judith@jhellerstein.com   Website: www.jhellerstein.com [1]

Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/ [2]

Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide

On 9/4/2017 7:04 AM, Daniel Dardailler wrote:

How about this for a start.

===

The concept of “Open Internet”, as referred to in the CCWG
objectives statement, can be described at many levels, e.g.
technogical, business, political, etc, and in particular, at the
societal level:

An Open Internet is one where all people are empowered to
contribute and to participate in building a worldwide culture that
opens our hearts and minds by respecting differences. It is an
Internet (i.e. a network of networks) that we, the people of the
world, recognize as ours  — something we have built together for
one another

At the technogical level, openness refers to how easily machines can
connect to each others and how stable, scalable, and secure the
network is. The IP routing and numbering systems, the DNS, or the
Open Standard process, have historically been serving an Open
Internet because of the opportunities they have provided to
participate, innovate and compete without artificial impediments
(e.g. patents, walled-garden).

At the policy level, supporting the Open Internet happens when for
instance governments put in place regulations that promote, support,
facilitate and guarantee equal connectivity at prices affordable to
all members of society, together with education and training efforts
toward making the next generation more Internet savvy.

In an ideal world, an Open Internet is one where no control or
impediments are placed based on the sender, recipient, content,
application or type of data being transmitted.

From that broad description, the CCWG has considered the parts of
the Open Internet that:
- are aligned with the overall ICANN's mission and core
commitments
- are in need of funding for more development support
- are creating value-added for the Open Internet at large
- are consensual enough so that they do not endanger the ICANN
community

...
<and here we need to apply our CCWG "filter" regarding layering,
shared value, political issues, etc>

On 2017-08-31 22:44, Marika Konings wrote:

Dear All,

Hereby attached the updated version of the open internet
definition /
description which incorporates the comments and suggestions that
were
submitted since the last version. As there are a number of
definitions
/ descriptions that have been put forward so far, are there any
volunteers who would like to take a stab at coming up with a draft

that brings the different perspectives together and addresses the
different comments and contributions to date which the CCWG could
review during its next meeting?

Best regards,

Marika

_MARIKA KONINGS_

_Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _

_Email: marika.konings@icann.org  _

_ _

_Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_

_Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
[1]
and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [2]. _

Links:
------
[1] http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso
[2]


http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers

_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds



Links:
------
[1] http://www.jhellerstein.com
[2] http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
[3] http://www.isif.asia/
[4] http://www.apnic.foundation/
_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds


_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds