Hi Marika

Re: Section 2 - I think that as part of this high level set of expectations, we should include some specific examples (as has already been given, but as a list) to demonstrate what could be appropriate reasons for an appeal so that applicants understand that the appeal process is only about the process undertaken and NOT the decision

Re: Section 3 - It would also be appropriate to impose a time limit on the feedback to the applicant so that they are not waiting around for a response.

Maureen



On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:51 AM Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:

Dear CCWG,

 

Following on from the last CCWG call and the input received on the individual appeals mechanism, please find attached an updated proposal for your review. Please share any comments, concerns or suggestions you may have in advance of the next CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 21 August.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

Marika Konings

Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings@icann.org  

 

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. 

 

_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.