HI Jonathan,
Thanks for the work of your drafting team. It is a great job. I very much like what you have done and it captures most of all the terms that we had spoken about. However, I think we need to add the words standards-based to the definition to ensure that it also remain accessible to people with disabilities and specific needs. If everyone was using agreed upon standards that were published by the W3C than people using assistive technologies would have a much easier time navigating the internet. I call to your attention the definition of Web accessibility from Wikipedia where it defines it as referring to the inclusive practice of removing barriers that prevent interaction with, or access to websites, by people with disabilities. When sites are correctly designed, developed and edited, all users have equal access to information and functionality.
I think adding the words standards-based would cover these issues
at least for me.
Like Vanda, I have no problem with the "should" since I also have interpreted it as a minimum list to be followed and can evolve as needed
Best,
Judith
_________________________________________________________________________ Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO Hellerstein & Associates 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008 Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517 E-mail: Judith@jhellerstein.com Website: www.jhellerstein.com Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/ Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
I have no problem with the “should” since I have interpreted it as a minimum list to be followed and can be evolve. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. On 10/18/17, 06:00, "ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Daniel Dardailler" <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org on behalf of danield@w3.org> wrote:Thanks Jonathan. I like this preample, but I'm a bit concerned with the way the listing at the end is presented, using "Projects should:". I think it'd better to introduce the list with the first sentence only: "Therefore, the CCWG considers the following to be important guidelines to applicants seeking auction proceeds funding:" Otherwise, one might (or should) think that all the listed criteria have to be fulfilled at once, which would reduce the scope to the most constraining one, i.e. "- Support ICANN's community activities and consensus-building processes" Another option would be to include this ICANN specific criteria in the first one, e.g. "- Be aligned +or in service+ of the ICANN's mission and core principles" And keep the "Projects should:" as a AND constraint. Edit: I think there's a typo: “(concept). probably should just be concept. On 2017-10-18 09:10, Jonathan Robinson wrote:Thanks Marika, All, please be aware of the following definition of an “open and interoperable” internet as proposed by the informal drafting team. _Note the following:_ _ _ _1. __This is a draft, please consider whether or not it includes all the key concepts required for a preamble? If not, what else is missing? _ _2. __Please bear in mind that the preamble is a place for key concepts or overarching points rather than the fine detail of the bulk of the proposal._ Thank-you, Jonathan On behalf of the drafting team FROM: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] SENT: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 8:57 PM TO: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org SUBJECT: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - CCWG Auction Proceeds Meeting on 19 October at 14.00 UTC Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Thursday 19 October at 14.00 UTC. Call details have been distributed separately. If you did not receive the call details and/or require a dial-out, please contact gnso-secs@icann.org. Best regards, Marika PROPOSED AGENDA – NEW GTLD AUCTION PROCEEDS CCWG MEETING – 19 OCTOBER 2017 * Roll Call * Welcome * Review of open and interoperable Internet description (to be distributed shortly) * Review of examples (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zQ66hCxrboAJPKeuU6nHwzHQwmU6g_3kS0JUSSC_tSk/edit) * Next steps in relation to charter question 7 ‘(‘Should ICANN oversee the solicitation and evaluation of proposals, or delegate to or coordinate with another entity, including, for example, a foundation created for this purpose?’) * Planning for ICANN60 * Confirm next steps and next meetings (Thursday 02 November 2017 - 8:45– 10:15 Working Group F2F Meeting in Hall B Section B/C and 13:30 – 15:00 Working Group F2F Meeting in Hall B Section B/C) _MARIKA KONINGS_ _Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _ _Email: marika.konings@icann.org _ _ _ _Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_ _Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [1] and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [2]. _ Links: ------ [1] http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso [2] http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds