Hola Daniel, Marika,

I support this, maybe it is still possible to have a longer meeting time.

Dietmar Stefitz

Saturday, February 4, 2017, 10:27:16 AM, you wrote:

DD> On 2017-02-02 19:13, Marika Konings wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,

>> Staff has tentatively requested Wednesday from 15.15 – 16.45 local
>> time for a CCWG-Auction Proceeds meeting. It is up to the CCWG to
>> decide whether or not you want to make use of that slot, but it is
>> easier to cancel the slot than to request one at a later date.

DD> I'll be there as well.

DD> I'm a bit surprised by seeing only 90 minutes allocated for a f2f. I
DD> hardly see how we can discuss, let alone resolve, more than a couple of
DD> issues in this timeframe, especially since it's our first f2f, so lots
DD> of "get to know each other" overhead.

DD> Or maybe I'm confused and this f2f will not be a working group meeting
DD> (making progress on our issue list) but more of a report to the
DD> community kind of event ?


DD> Related to ICANN WG f2f, I have a few questions.

DD> So far, I haven't seen any dramatic difference in the way this group is
DD> run vs. a W3C working group developping a technical specification. We
DD> also have teleconfs, we have email exchanges (and documents being edited
DD> in parallel), but all our WG f2f are at least one full day, sometimes 2
DD> or 3 days long. And they usually have 3 of those per year (besides those
DD> held at our plenary). IETF is similar I think.

DD> The rationale is that f2f, given their higher communication bandwidth,
DD> are where most progress are made in resolving issues, and also that of
DD> course it costs a lot of money to gather 20 experts in one location, so
DD> better use their time effectively.

DD> Maybe there is a difference between a f2f run as part of an ICANN
DD> plenary, and an isolated WG f2f ?














>> Best regards,

>> Marika

>> On 2/2/17, 12:07 PM, "Daniel Dardailler" <danield@w3.org> wrote:

>>     With ICANN 58 a couple of months away, I suppose that like me,
>> people
>>     need to arrange travel (or not) to Denmark.

>>     Do we already know if we're going to meet, and which day ?
>>     And if we don't know yet, when will we know ?

>>     Thanks.

DD> _______________________________________________
DD> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
DD> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
DD> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds



--
Saludos,
Dietmar