Same understanding Vanda, 
Those are meer example projects work as kind of guidance to projects along the line.

In fact, I suggest to include some project examples that doesn't fall in the scope of the Auction proceed. 

Nadira
 
 

Virus-free. www.avast.com

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> wrote:
i understand those are just examples. Rules shaw be clear to allow all related projects as those examples, to be accepted if under those rules.


On Nov 15, 2017, at 14:04, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:

Marilyn, the following example is already included in the document:
 
5 year grants to support the development of NGOs and Internet Governance forums in 100 locations at local, national, regional and global level increases participation at ICANN processes by
35%. 
 
Does that sufficiently align with what you are proposing? As a reminder, it is not the objective to cover every possible project that could be considered consistent with ICANN’s mission. The focus is on ensuring that examples are sufficiently clear to provide guidance on what types of projects are considered consistent with ICANN’s mission and which ones are not considered consistent.
 
Best regards,
 
Marika
 
From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at 09:50
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's meetings and latest draft of open and interoperable Internet description
 
Marika, Can I still offer an example [which I thought I had but perhaps hadn't submitted clearly enough] of grants that could support the National and Regional IGFs where the NRI is including ICANN related topics in their NRI, and might apply for a grant to further their multi stakeholder engagement and inclusiveness.
 
 
Almost all of the NRIs from developing countries and most from the developed countries have ICANN related sessions, ranging from IPv6, to DNS to engagement of stakeholders in ICANN related topics. 
 
Marilyn Cade

 

From: ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:19 AM
To: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's meetings and latest draft of open and interoperable Internet description
 
Dear All,
 
Please find attached for your review the notes & action items from today’s CCWG meetings. Also attached is the latest version of the open and interoperable Internet description with a number of updates that were made during today’s meeting. As noted in the action items, the small drafting team will now take this draft and aim to finalize it ahead of the next meeting which is scheduled for 16 November.
 
Best regards,
 
Marika
 
Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
 
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org] and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]. 
 
_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds


_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds



--