Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] agenda: New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting | Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC
Dear All, In relation to agenda item 3c, note that the small team is putting forward the following additions for inclusion in the Final Report: Proposed guidance to evaluators: Evaluators may need to differentiate between what it is in the regular ICANN operational budget and what has been funded on a more exceptional basis, but this will be a determination that needs to be made by the evaluators in line with the legal and fiduciary requirements. Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the constraints otherwise imposed. Proposed preamble to annex with examples: Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the overall purpose of the auction proceeds and constraints otherwise imposed. Examples provided are specifically intended to be illustrative, not definitive. If you have any comments on these proposed additions, please share them with the mailing list or during tomorrow’s meeting. Best regards, Marika From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 07:24 To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] agenda: New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting | Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting which is scheduled for Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC. You are encouraged to review the linked documents ahead of the meeting and share any comments and/or proposed edits you may have with the mailing list. Best regards, Joke Braeken Proposed agenda 1. Roll Call 2. Welcome – DOI / SOI Updates 1. Update on status of outstanding action items: Reminder: CCWG to regularly review overview of CCWG agreements to date and latest versions of templates (see https://community.icann.org/x/zYMWBg) * Follow-up action items by leadership team * FAQs * Comment #4 (charter question #2) - Marilyn, Elliot, Jonathan, Alan and Maureen to develop draft language for inclusion 1. Continue review of comments: see templates published on https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/Initial+Report+Public+Comment+R... * Charter question #11 input * Sections 1-4 input * Annex C input * Annex D input * General comments * Proposals for funding allocation input 1. Confirm next steps and next meeting: Wednesday 22 May at 14.00 UTC. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO [twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO&d=DwM...> Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ [facebook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_ccnso_...> http://ccnso.icann.org [ccnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ...>
Hi all I was an apology for the small group's last call, but am good with the statement regarding considerations as guidance for evaluators. Maureen On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 5:46 AM Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
In relation to agenda item 3c, note that the small team is putting forward the following additions for inclusion in the Final Report:
*Proposed guidance to evaluators*:
Evaluators may need to differentiate between what it is in the regular ICANN operational budget and what has been funded on a more exceptional basis, but this will be a determination that needs to be made by the evaluators in line with the legal and fiduciary requirements. Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the constraints otherwise imposed.
*Proposed preamble to annex with examples*:
Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the overall purpose of the auction proceeds and constraints otherwise imposed. Examples provided are specifically intended to be illustrative, not definitive.
If you have any comments on these proposed additions, please share them with the mailing list or during tomorrow’s meeting.
Best regards,
Marika
*From: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org> *Date: *Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 07:24 *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] agenda: New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting | Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC
Dear All,
Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting which is scheduled for Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC. You are encouraged to review the linked documents ahead of the meeting and share any comments and/or proposed edits you may have with the mailing list.
Best regards,
Joke Braeken
*Proposed agenda*
1. Roll Call 2. Welcome – DOI / SOI Updates
1. Update on status of outstanding action items:
Reminder: CCWG to regularly review overview of CCWG agreements to date and latest versions of templates (see https://community.icann.org/x/zYMWBg)
1. Follow-up action items by leadership team 2. FAQs 3. Comment #4 (charter question #2) - Marilyn, Elliot, Jonathan, Alan and Maureen to develop draft language for inclusion
1. Continue review of comments: see templates published on https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/Initial+Report+Public+Comment+R...
1. Charter question #11 input 2. Sections 1-4 input 3. Annex C input 4. Annex D input 5. General comments 6. Proposals for funding allocation input
1. Confirm next steps and next meeting:
Wednesday 22 May at 14.00 UTC.
Joke Braeken
ccNSO Policy Advisor
joke.braeken@icann.org
Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO [twitter.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO&d=DwM...>
Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ [facebook.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_ccnso_...>
http://ccnso.icann.org [ccnso.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ...>
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
I do believe on the preamble of examples we shall include something regarding to innovation and views of the future of the Internet English is not my language but I may suggest, other can correct: * Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the overall purpose of the auction proceeds and constraints otherwise imposed. Examples provided are specifically intended to be illustrative, not definitive and openness to innovation and the future of internet shall guide Evaluators. Best regards Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of 'Marika Konings' <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 12:46 To: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org>, "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] agenda: New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting | Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC Dear All, In relation to agenda item 3c, note that the small team is putting forward the following additions for inclusion in the Final Report: Proposed guidance to evaluators: Evaluators may need to differentiate between what it is in the regular ICANN operational budget and what has been funded on a more exceptional basis, but this will be a determination that needs to be made by the evaluators in line with the legal and fiduciary requirements. Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the constraints otherwise imposed. Proposed preamble to annex with examples: Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the overall purpose of the auction proceeds and constraints otherwise imposed. Examples provided are specifically intended to be illustrative, not definitive. If you have any comments on these proposed additions, please share them with the mailing list or during tomorrow’s meeting. Best regards, Marika From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 07:24 To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] agenda: New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting | Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting which is scheduled for Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC. You are encouraged to review the linked documents ahead of the meeting and share any comments and/or proposed edits you may have with the mailing list. Best regards, Joke Braeken Proposed agenda 1. Roll Call 2. Welcome – DOI / SOI Updates 3. Update on status of outstanding action items: Reminder: CCWG to regularly review overview of CCWG agreements to date and latest versions of templates (see https://community.icann.org/x/zYMWBg) a. Follow-up action items by leadership team b. FAQs c. Comment #4 (charter question #2) - Marilyn, Elliot, Jonathan, Alan and Maureen to develop draft language for inclusion 4. Continue review of comments: see templates published on https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/Initial+Report+Public+Comment+R... a. Charter question #11 input b. Sections 1-4 input c. Annex C input d. Annex D input e. General comments f. Proposals for funding allocation input 5. Confirm next steps and next meeting: Wednesday 22 May at 14.00 UTC. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO [twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO&d=DwM...> Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ [facebook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_ccnso_...> http://ccnso.icann.org [ccnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ...>
I like that addition, Vanda. I thought something like this was added in another area relating to the illustrative examples, but no harm in adding it here too. On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 8:36 AM Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> wrote:
I do believe on the preamble of examples we shall include something regarding to innovation and views of the future of the Internet
English is not my language but I may suggest, other can correct:
- Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the overall purpose of the auction proceeds and constraints otherwise imposed. Examples provided are specifically intended to be illustrative, not definitive *and openness to innovation and the future of internet shall guide Evaluators. *
Best regards
*Vanda Scartezini*
*Polo Consultores Associados*
*Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
*01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
*Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253*
*Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 *
*Sorry for any typos. *
*From: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of 'Marika Konings' <marika.konings@icann.org> *Date: *Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 12:46 *To: *Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org>, " ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] agenda: New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting | Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC
Dear All,
In relation to agenda item 3c, note that the small team is putting forward the following additions for inclusion in the Final Report:
*Proposed guidance to evaluators*:
Evaluators may need to differentiate between what it is in the regular ICANN operational budget and what has been funded on a more exceptional basis, but this will be a determination that needs to be made by the evaluators in line with the legal and fiduciary requirements. Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the constraints otherwise imposed.
*Proposed preamble to annex with examples*:
Consistency with the ICANN mission is a necessary but not sufficient condition for funding. Evaluators should specifically consider the scope and impact of the proposed project in light of the overall purpose of the auction proceeds and constraints otherwise imposed. Examples provided are specifically intended to be illustrative, not definitive.
If you have any comments on these proposed additions, please share them with the mailing list or during tomorrow’s meeting.
Best regards,
Marika
*From: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org> *Date: *Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 07:24 *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] agenda: New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting | Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC
Dear All,
Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting which is scheduled for Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 14.00 UTC. You are encouraged to review the linked documents ahead of the meeting and share any comments and/or proposed edits you may have with the mailing list.
Best regards,
Joke Braeken
*Proposed agenda*
1. Roll Call
2. Welcome – DOI / SOI Updates
3. Update on status of outstanding action items:
Reminder: CCWG to regularly review overview of CCWG agreements to date and latest versions of templates (see https://community.icann.org/x/zYMWBg)
a. Follow-up action items by leadership team
b. FAQs
c. Comment #4 (charter question #2) - Marilyn, Elliot, Jonathan, Alan and Maureen to develop draft language for inclusion
4. Continue review of comments: see templates published on https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/Initial+Report+Public+Comment+R...
a. Charter question #11 input
b. Sections 1-4 input
c. Annex C input
d. Annex D input
e. General comments
f. Proposals for funding allocation input
5. Confirm next steps and next meeting:
Wednesday 22 May at 14.00 UTC.
Joke Braeken
ccNSO Policy Advisor
joke.braeken@icann.org
Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO [twitter.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO&d=DwM...>
Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ [facebook.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_ccnso_...>
http://ccnso.icann.org [ccnso.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ...>
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
participants (3)
-
Marika Konings -
Maureen Hilyard -
Vanda Scartezini