Hi everyone, It seems my email address was just added to the list just a few hours ago, so I hope someone can be so kind and provide a bit of information about what has happened so far, I have not checked yet the ICANN wiki to see what I have missed –sorry- but if someone can be so kind to help me be up to date that will be wonderful ☺ I can see some concrete suggestions about mechanisms already, and a comment about missing out on a meeting, so it seems I lost some information. Do we have a chair and vice-chair already? The charter gives us some questions to start working on, and it will be great to have a first round around the group to know what are the initial thoughts of the group around those and if there is any questions that are not included there that we should take into consideration. Maybe a google doc can be useful to get our ideas across using the questions as a guideline? Have you already gone through the questions in detail? And finally, just wanted to say that before starting to shoot ideas about what mechanisms will be best, I would like to ask if it is possible to get assistance a list of the existing financial mechanisms in the US that will not jeopardize ICANN tax status, which is one of the important aspects of the charter that we need to work around. As there are different mechanisms in every country, and not all the people in this group might be familiar with those, then it is important that we have some input about what is available that might be a good fit, to start a conversation with some solid basis. All mechanisms will have pros and cons and it will be good to be able to make an informed recommendation to the board. Looking forward for a productive exchange of ideas, for the benefit of the Internet we have worked so hard for in our respective region sand through a wide and diverse set of experience. Warm regards, Sylvia -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation | Head of Programs | sylvia@apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> http://www.apnic.foundation<http://www.apnic.foundation/> ISIF Asia | http://www.isif.asia<http://www.isif.asia/> FB ISIF.asia | G+ ISIFAsia | @ISIF_Asia 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 * Love trees. Print only if necessary. From: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 4:11 AM To: Dietmar Stefitz <djs@bemarnet.es> Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Hello, I personal would like the idea of putting up a process that apportion part of the funds to existing trust funds (like the IETF endowment) or any other program. However anything that would imply spending significant part of the funds on administrative matters like setting up a separate department or ICANN putting up her own trust fund can/should be avoided as much as possible. The suggestion of hearing experiences of those who manage donor funds at ICANN58 is a good one, it can also be during one of the calls. Cheers! Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Jan 30, 2017 18:28, "Dietmar Stefitz" <djs@bemarnet.es<mailto:djs@bemarnet.es>> wrote: Hi all, I wish to apologize for not being on the call, but I have been on a flight back home from NamesCON, the biggest comercial Conference on the Domain Industry. Here is my INPUT : I think this is a unique opportunity to create some for Generation lasting Foundations in various fields of Interest, which are in the Spirit of Icann on it's own and a strong, neutral Internet Community, which should include all parties involved in the different fields. They can be formed as various Foundations/Trusts, which get equal parts of the auction funds, and future special proceeds. This foundations should be in neutral countries like Switzerland and have a council of experts in the assigned field. I am sure we can find some experts, which run big charity funds to give us their thoughts on this. Maybe we can invite them to the Copenhagen meeting. -- Saludos, Dietmar Stefitz Skype: dietmar07 TEl: (+34) 96 274 07 08<tel:+34%20962%2074%2007%2008> Movil:(+34) 656 852 447<tel:+34%20656%2085%2024%2047> _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

Thanks Marika for your prompt response. We are in good hands then! Thanks to Ching and Jonathan in advance for their guidance and support to complete the task at hand. I will be checking the link you provided to be prepared for the next call. Warm regards, Sylvia -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation | Head of Programs | sylvia@apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> http://www.apnic.foundation<http://www.apnic.foundation/> ISIF Asia | http://www.isif.asia<http://www.isif.asia/> FB ISIF.asia | G+ ISIFAsia | @ISIF_Asia 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 * Love trees. Print only if necessary. From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 8:09 AM To: "sylvia@apnic.net" <sylvia@apnic.net>, "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Hi Sylvia, You can find all the information related to the first call which took place last week, including notes and action items here: https://community.icann.org/x/D7HDAw. The ccNSO and GNSO have appointed co-chairs to the CCWG, namely Ching Chiao and Jonathan Robinson. Other co-chair appointments may be forthcoming as not all chartering organizations have confirmed their members (see https://community.icann.org/x/FpjDAw for current list of members and participants). Best regards, Marika From: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Sylvia Cadena <sylvia@apnic.net> Date: Monday, January 30, 2017 at 4:04 PM To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Hi everyone, It seems my email address was just added to the list just a few hours ago, so I hope someone can be so kind and provide a bit of information about what has happened so far, I have not checked yet the ICANN wiki to see what I have missed –sorry- but if someone can be so kind to help me be up to date that will be wonderful ☺ I can see some concrete suggestions about mechanisms already, and a comment about missing out on a meeting, so it seems I lost some information. Do we have a chair and vice-chair already? The charter gives us some questions to start working on, and it will be great to have a first round around the group to know what are the initial thoughts of the group around those and if there is any questions that are not included there that we should take into consideration. Maybe a google doc can be useful to get our ideas across using the questions as a guideline? Have you already gone through the questions in detail? And finally, just wanted to say that before starting to shoot ideas about what mechanisms will be best, I would like to ask if it is possible to get assistance a list of the existing financial mechanisms in the US that will not jeopardize ICANN tax status, which is one of the important aspects of the charter that we need to work around. As there are different mechanisms in every country, and not all the people in this group might be familiar with those, then it is important that we have some input about what is available that might be a good fit, to start a conversation with some solid basis. All mechanisms will have pros and cons and it will be good to be able to make an informed recommendation to the board. Looking forward for a productive exchange of ideas, for the benefit of the Internet we have worked so hard for in our respective region sand through a wide and diverse set of experience. Warm regards, Sylvia -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation | Head of Programs | sylvia@apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> http://www.apnic.foundation[apnic.foundation]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.apnic.foundation_&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=2B6LE54H8airKB9apne_NT1CDhK1CKc8NrFzZcm3jps&s=Kh73A4QQIuJfxVB7LXjvM0r_4RLLYGUxmvjlafIFitY&e=> ISIF Asia | http://www.isif.asia[isif.asia]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.isif.asia_&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=2B6LE54H8airKB9apne_NT1CDhK1CKc8NrFzZcm3jps&s=u6ijxvK5Nejbm1UL24abuHKqlkLdZLCeZqOyRqrX4Bc&e=> FB ISIF.asia | G+ ISIFAsia | @ISIF_Asia 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 * Love trees. Print only if necessary. From: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 4:11 AM To: Dietmar Stefitz <djs@bemarnet.es> Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Hello, I personal would like the idea of putting up a process that apportion part of the funds to existing trust funds (like the IETF endowment) or any other program. However anything that would imply spending significant part of the funds on administrative matters like setting up a separate department or ICANN putting up her own trust fund can/should be avoided as much as possible. The suggestion of hearing experiences of those who manage donor funds at ICANN58 is a good one, it can also be during one of the calls. Cheers! Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Jan 30, 2017 18:28, "Dietmar Stefitz" <djs@bemarnet.es<mailto:djs@bemarnet.es>> wrote: Hi all, I wish to apologize for not being on the call, but I have been on a flight back home from NamesCON, the biggest comercial Conference on the Domain Industry. Here is my INPUT : I think this is a unique opportunity to create some for Generation lasting Foundations in various fields of Interest, which are in the Spirit of Icann on it's own and a strong, neutral Internet Community, which should include all parties involved in the different fields. They can be formed as various Foundations/Trusts, which get equal parts of the auction funds, and future special proceeds. This foundations should be in neutral countries like Switzerland and have a council of experts in the assigned field. I am sure we can find some experts, which run big charity funds to give us their thoughts on this. Maybe we can invite them to the Copenhagen meeting. -- Saludos, Dietmar Stefitz Skype: dietmar07 TEl: (+34) 96 274 07 08<tel:+34%20962%2074%2007%2008> Movil:(+34) 656 852 447<tel:+34%20656%2085%2024%2047> _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

Dear all, I missed the call but I am impressed by the progress that was made. Reading the action points/discussion notes I think our focus now should be on expanding and finalizing Item 5 - Workplan. I suggest we set a deadline for having the workplan in place and also focus on this item on the next call. I have a question on scope meantime. Probably those in the group who may have participated in the formulation of the charter could be of help: Is this exercise confined to the proceeds of the first round auctions or do we need to come up with a mechanism encompassing any future rollout scenarios (currently not known). The Charter just refers to "new gTLDAuction Proceeds". Kind Regards, Waudo Siganga Chair The Computer Society of Kenya Tel: +254722395900

Thank you for the clarification Marika. To me this translates to the group's mandate being a commensurate "one-time" mechanism. Kind Regards, Waudo On Wed, Feb 1, 2017, at 05:28 AM, Marika Konings wrote:

Dear Waudo,

Please note that the charter states that:

“These proceeds are to be considered as an exceptional, one-time source of revenue”.

However, you may also be interested in the opinion that Alan (co- chair of the drafting team that developed the charter) shared in an earlier thread: “- There *may* be another round or rounds;

- There *may* be auctions

- Any such auctions *may* have their proceeds designated for uses similar to in the first round.

All of these would be the result of GNSO PDP(s) and Board action, and are out of scope for us, regardless of whether we think any or all of this would be good (and I am not advocating any of this here). If all of those were to come to be, then the process we are developing *may* be applicable (again, a decision WAY out of our scope). Nothing that we do should REQUIRE that we must start all over again and re-invent this in such a situation.”

Best regards,

Marika

From: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of waudo siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com> Date: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 1:24 AM To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg- auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG

Dear all,

I missed the call but I am impressed by the progress that was made. Reading the action points/discussion notes I think our focus now should be on expanding and finalizing Item 5 - Workplan. I suggest we set a deadline for having the workplan in place and also focus on this item on the next call.

I have a question on scope meantime. Probably those in the group who may have participated in the formulation of the charter could be of help: Is this exercise confined to the proceeds of the first round auctions or do we need to come up with a mechanism encompassing any future rollout scenarios (currently not known). The Charter just refers to "new gTLDAuction Proceeds".

Kind Regards,

Waudo Siganga Chair The Computer Society of Kenya

Tel: +254722395900

the problem is that subsequent rounds are remote and uncertain in both time and money. the mechanisms for giving away a certain $150m are different than a periodic (and uncertain) $23m. as the below states, we will always be welcome to follow practices developed here in subsequent rounds. we should neither i) make more work for ourselves than we need nor ii) institutionalize an "ICANN charity”. our focus should be on making a meaningful difference in the world with this (very) large pot of money. EN

On Feb 1, 2017, at 6:19 AM, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> wrote:

I think the one-time factor in terms of funding source (which in itself could turn out to be two-time or more, but not our business) doesn't equate to a one-time approach for disbursing these funds.

E.g. if the agency we're designing goes for bi-annual periodic calls to give away a slice of the overall source funding available at each call, it could easily last for several years, and several years is kind of our own (the Internet/Web technical community) survival horizon, so hardly something we can call a one-time granting project IMO.

At https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds it says that there is 233M in the bank as revenue source. If every six months, each call can grant 23M to various projects (we will have to discuss what is a typical project grant, for what duration), then we already have 5 years of activity for this agency.

On 2017-02-01 03:28, Marika Konings wrote:

...

Dear Waudo, Please note that the charter states that: “These proceeds are to be considered as an exceptional, one-time source of revenue”. However, you may also be interested in the opinion that Alan (co-chair of the drafting team that developed the charter) shared in an earlier thread: _“- There *may* be another round or rounds;_ _- There *may* be auctions_ _- Any such auctions *may* have their proceeds designated for uses similar to in the first round._ _ _ _All of these would be the result of GNSO PDP(s) and Board action, and are out of scope for us, regardless of whether we think any or all of this would be good (and I am not advocating any of this here). If all of those were to come to be, then the process we are developing *may* be applicable (again, a decision WAY out of our scope). Nothing that we do should REQUIRE that we must start all over again and re-invent this in such a situation.”_ _ _ Best regards, Marika FROM: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of waudo siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com> DATE: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 1:24 AM TO: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> SUBJECT: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Dear all, I missed the call but I am impressed by the progress that was made. Reading the action points/discussion notes I think our focus now should be on expanding and finalizing Item 5 - Workplan. I suggest we set a deadline for having the workplan in place and also focus on this item on the next call. I have a question on scope meantime. Probably those in the group who may have participated in the formulation of the charter could be of help: Is this exercise confined to the proceeds of the first round auctions or do we need to come up with a mechanism encompassing any future rollout scenarios (currently not known). The Charter just refers to "new gTLDAuction Proceeds". Kind Regards, Waudo Siganga Chair The Computer Society of Kenya Tel: +254722395900 _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

"an organization that has as goal to fund projects aimed to bridge the digital divide" this is not ICANN’s mission. we are dealing with an exception, not the organization’s goal. EN

On Feb 1, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Peter Vergote <peter.vergote@dnsbelgium.be> wrote:

Hi all,

I have to agree with Daniel here.

Years ago we donated a lump sum of money (4 mio EUR) to an organization that has as goal to fund projects aimed to bridge the digital divide. The project plan envisaged a number of calls for projects (to receive funding) over a period of 3 years.

In reality the program has run for more than 4,5 years because of:

- Efficient cost management; - Lower costs/funding per project than anticipated; - Lesser inflow of projects than anticipated.

Even if the auction proceeds would be a one off, chances are that the distribution of funds will be more iterative and may take many years as explained by Daniel.

Best regs,

Peter

Peter Vergote Legal & Corp. Affairs Manager +32 16 29 89 28 +32 474 790096 www.dnsbelgium.be <http://www.dnsbelgium.be/>

Op 1/02/17 12:19 heeft ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org namens Daniel Dardailler <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org namens danield@w3.org> geschreven:

I think the one-time factor in terms of funding source (which in itself could turn out to be two-time or more, but not our business) doesn't equate to a one-time approach for disbursing these funds.

E.g. if the agency we're designing goes for bi-annual periodic calls to give away a slice of the overall source funding available at each call, it could easily last for several years, and several years is kind of our own (the Internet/Web technical community) survival horizon, so hardly something we can call a one-time granting project IMO.

At https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds it says that there is 233M in the bank as revenue source. If every six months, each call can grant 23M to various projects (we will have to discuss what is a typical project grant, for what duration), then we already have 5 years of activity for this agency.

On 2017-02-01 03:28, Marika Konings wrote:

...

Dear Waudo,

Please note that the charter states that:

“These proceeds are to be considered as an exceptional, one-time source of revenue”.

However, you may also be interested in the opinion that Alan (co-chair of the drafting team that developed the charter) shared in an earlier thread:

_“- There *may* be another round or rounds;_

_- There *may* be auctions_

_- Any such auctions *may* have their proceeds designated for uses similar to in the first round._

_ _

_All of these would be the result of GNSO PDP(s) and Board action, and are out of scope for us, regardless of whether we think any or all of this would be good (and I am not advocating any of this here). If all of those were to come to be, then the process we are developing *may* be applicable (again, a decision WAY out of our scope). Nothing that we do should REQUIRE that we must start all over again and re-invent this in such a situation.”_

_ _

Best regards,

Marika

FROM: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of waudo siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com> DATE: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 1:24 AM TO: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> SUBJECT: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG

Dear all,

I missed the call but I am impressed by the progress that was made. Reading the action points/discussion notes I think our focus now should be on expanding and finalizing Item 5 - Workplan. I suggest we set a deadline for having the workplan in place and also focus on this item on the next call.

I have a question on scope meantime. Probably those in the group who may have participated in the formulation of the charter could be of help: Is this exercise confined to the proceeds of the first round auctions or do we need to come up with a mechanism encompassing any future rollout scenarios (currently not known). The Charter just refers to "new gTLDAuction Proceeds".

Kind Regards,

Waudo Siganga Chair The Computer Society of Kenya

Tel: +254722395900 _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

Elliot, You are right for sure that we are not going to settle all of this by exchanging a couple of mails ;-) The mission of the organization I mentioned is not what matters, neither was it any indication of what needs to be done with the funds. I was just giving an example – based upon our experience - that any kind of mechanism used to distribute funds might be more iterative and longer than what could be expected. Best regs, Peter Peter Vergote Legal & Corp. Affairs Manager +32 16 29 89 28 +32 474 790096 www.dnsbelgium.be <http://www.dnsbelgium.be/> Op 1/02/17 15:08 heeft elliot noss <enoss@tucows.com> geschreven: and I should note, we are not going to settle this in email and I look forward to meeting you all and discussing this face to face in copenhagen. EN > On Feb 1, 2017, at 9:08 AM, elliot noss <ENoss@tucows.com> wrote: > > "an organization that has as goal to fund projects aimed to bridge the digital divide" > > this is not ICANN’s mission. we are dealing with an exception, not the organization’s goal. > > EN > >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Peter Vergote <peter.vergote@dnsbelgium.be> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have to agree with Daniel here. >> >> Years ago we donated a lump sum of money (4 mio EUR) to an organization that has as goal to fund projects aimed to bridge the digital divide. The project plan envisaged a number of calls for projects (to receive funding) over a period of 3 years. >> >> In reality the program has run for more than 4,5 years because of: >> >> - Efficient cost management; >> - Lower costs/funding per project than anticipated; >> - Lesser inflow of projects than anticipated. >> >> Even if the auction proceeds would be a one off, chances are that the distribution of funds will be more iterative and may take many years as explained by Daniel. >> >> Best regs, >> >> Peter >> >> Peter Vergote >> Legal & Corp. Affairs Manager >> +32 16 29 89 28 >> +32 474 790096 >> www.dnsbelgium.be <http://www.dnsbelgium.be/> >> >> >> >> Op 1/02/17 12:19 heeft ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org namens Daniel Dardailler <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org namens danield@w3.org> geschreven: >> >> I think the one-time factor in terms of funding source (which in itself >> could turn out to be two-time or more, but not our business) doesn't >> equate to a one-time approach for disbursing these funds. >> >> E.g. if the agency we're designing goes for bi-annual periodic calls to >> give away a slice of the overall source funding available at each call, >> it could easily last for several years, and several years is kind of our >> own (the Internet/Web technical community) survival horizon, so hardly >> something we can call a one-time granting project IMO. >> >> At https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds >> it says that there is 233M in the bank as revenue source. >> If every six months, each call can grant 23M to various projects (we >> will have to discuss what is a typical project grant, for what >> duration), then we already have 5 years of activity for this agency. >> >> >> >> >> On 2017-02-01 03:28, Marika Konings wrote: >>> Dear Waudo, >>> >>> Please note that the charter states that: >>> >>> “These proceeds are to be considered as an exceptional, one-time >>> source of revenue”. >>> >>> However, you may also be interested in the opinion that Alan (co-chair >>> of the drafting team that developed the charter) shared in an earlier >>> thread: >>> >>> _“- There *may* be another round or rounds;_ >>> >>> _- There *may* be auctions_ >>> >>> _- Any such auctions *may* have their proceeds designated for uses >>> similar to in the first round._ >>> >>> _ _ >>> >>> _All of these would be the result of GNSO PDP(s) and Board action, and >>> are out of scope for us, regardless of whether we think any or all of >>> this would be good (and I am not advocating any of this here). If all >>> of those were to come to be, then the process we are developing *may* >>> be applicable (again, a decision WAY out of our scope). Nothing that >>> we do should REQUIRE that we must start all over again and re-invent >>> this in such a situation.”_ >>> >>> _ _ >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Marika >>> >>> FROM: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of waudo >>> siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com> >>> DATE: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 1:24 AM >>> TO: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> SUBJECT: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I missed the call but I am impressed by the progress that was made. >>> Reading the action points/discussion notes I think our focus now >>> should be on expanding and finalizing Item 5 - Workplan. I suggest we >>> set a deadline for having the workplan in place and also focus on this >>> item on the next call. >>> >>> I have a question on scope meantime. Probably those in the group who >>> may have participated in the formulation of the charter could be of >>> help: Is this exercise confined to the proceeds of the first round >>> auctions or do we need to come up with a mechanism encompassing any >>> future rollout scenarios (currently not known). The Charter just >>> refers to "new gTLDAuction Proceeds". >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> >>> Waudo Siganga >>> Chair >>> The Computer Society of Kenya >>> >>> Tel: +254722395900 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list >> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list >> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >