For your review - latest version of Final Report by Wednesday 11 September 2019
Dear CCWG, Please find here for your review the latest version of the Final Report: https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1hWfSYXuhAalh7F_AkkPDuxU7xf-_bNc.... Attached you will find a redline version that shows you all the updates that have been made since the previous version but as the large number of redlines may be slightly overwhelming, we have posted the clean version for review and comments. Please note the following: * Text highlighted in blue are those developed by the different small teams and are new compared to the previous version of the report; * Text highlighted in yellow are items that need to be updated after completion of the survey and decision on whether or not to publish for public comment. * Redlines in the attached version are updates in response to comments received on the previous version, clarifications or the result of reorganization of the text because certain recommendations seemed to fit better under a different charter questions. You are requested to focus your review on any ‘cannot live with items’ that need further discussion or consideration. Of course, if you spot any grammatical errors, inconsistencies or language that could be clarified, please note those as well. As a reminder your input is requested by Wednesday 11 September 2019 at the latest (see timeline below). Best regards, Marika Action Expected Timing - By Finalize work on items discussed during today’s meeting Friday 23 August 2019 Staff to integrate agreed to language in draft final report and produce ‘final’ version for review Friday 30 August 2019 CCWG to review draft final report and flag any issues of major concern Wednesday 11 September 2019 CCWG Meeting: * Discuss any major concerns identified * Consider whether a public comment period is desirable Wednesday 18 September 2019 Launch indicative survey on mechanisms Friday 20 September 2019 Publish results of indicative survey Friday 27 September 2019 CCWG members to consult with respective groups Friday 11 October 2019 Re-launch survey on mechanisms Monday 14 October 2019 Finalize report based on definitive survey results and either publish for public comment or submit to CO Friday 25 October 2019 ICANN66 session to present Final Report Wednesday 6 November 2019 – 15.15 – 18.30 Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
Thanks for sending the present DRAFT Final Report. I will spend time reading the full report in more detail, having only skimmed it now, at 6 am my time. However, I have an immediate serious issue with page 14 and 15. We have spent the last several weeks discussing Mechanism A and Mechanism C. Almost no time even mentioning Mechanism B. Yet, I see in the report that Mechanism C is not even referenced under Charter Question #7. By staff and the leadership team even including Mechanism A and B here, it implies that these are the two mechanisms preferred for further assessment. I do not believe that is generally supported by the majority of the members of the CCWG-AP. We haven't yet "rated" the three mechanisms, but we have primarily discussed only two in the recent discussions -- and that does not include Mechanism B. So, I don't see what the justification is for excluding Mechanism C here OR, these two paragraphs should be edited out and just keep the new text. I am sure no one means to reflect a preference here, and possibly this is just unfortunate. However, think about it: if the "rating" we are doing selects A and C, and then the staff/leadership draft in the next paragraph shows preference for A and B, it gives a very confusing message to the community, to the Board, and to the SO/ACs. ________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 6:29 PM To: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - latest version of Final Report by Wednesday 11 September 2019 Dear CCWG, Please find here for your review the latest version of the Final Report: https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1hWfSYXuhAalh7F_AkkPDuxU7xf-_bNcR/view?usp=sharing<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Fa%2Ficann.org%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1hWfSYXuhAalh7F_AkkPDuxU7xf-_bNcR%2Fview%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3419acf80cd44b37415808d72d997df9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637028010132230823&sdata=R%2BTRNsQ3B4BDbPvzOlJInGdDlAiKKt%2BQPSTs%2BPxKX50%3D&reserved=0>. Attached you will find a redline version that shows you all the updates that have been made since the previous version but as the large number of redlines may be slightly overwhelming, we have posted the clean version for review and comments. Please note the following: * Text highlighted in blue are those developed by the different small teams and are new compared to the previous version of the report; * Text highlighted in yellow are items that need to be updated after completion of the survey and decision on whether or not to publish for public comment. * Redlines in the attached version are updates in response to comments received on the previous version, clarifications or the result of reorganization of the text because certain recommendations seemed to fit better under a different charter questions. You are requested to focus your review on any ‘cannot live with items’ that need further discussion or consideration. Of course, if you spot any grammatical errors, inconsistencies or language that could be clarified, please note those as well. As a reminder your input is requested by Wednesday 11 September 2019 at the latest (see timeline below). Best regards, Marika Action Expected Timing - By Finalize work on items discussed during today’s meeting Friday 23 August 2019 Staff to integrate agreed to language in draft final report and produce ‘final’ version for review Friday 30 August 2019 CCWG to review draft final report and flag any issues of major concern Wednesday 11 September 2019 CCWG Meeting: * Discuss any major concerns identified * Consider whether a public comment period is desirable Wednesday 18 September 2019 Launch indicative survey on mechanisms Friday 20 September 2019 Publish results of indicative survey Friday 27 September 2019 CCWG members to consult with respective groups Friday 11 October 2019 Re-launch survey on mechanisms Monday 14 October 2019 Finalize report based on definitive survey results and either publish for public comment or submit to CO Friday 25 October 2019 ICANN66 session to present Final Report Wednesday 6 November 2019 – 15.15 – 18.30 Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flearn.icann...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgnso.icann....>.
On 31-08-19 12:49, Marilyn Cade wrote:
So, I don't see what the justification is for excluding Mechanism C here
Indeed. The NCSG supported Mechanism C in our written comments, and our position hasn't changed.
However, think about it: if the "rating" we are doing selects A and C, and then the staff/leadership draft in the next paragraph shows preference for A and B, it gives a very confusing message to the community, to the Board, and to the SO/ACs.
I agree. Julf
Marilyn - this was simply a mistake. In my exchanges with staff it was all correct, we had worked on a Google doc but then we decided to have the mechanism part of the text finalized after our survey ... it must have happened then. Thank you, Erika On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:49 PM Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sending the present DRAFT Final Report.
I will spend time reading the full report in more detail, having only skimmed it now, at 6 am my time.
However, I have an immediate serious issue with page 14 and 15.
We have spent the last several weeks discussing Mechanism A and Mechanism C. Almost no time even mentioning Mechanism B. Yet, I see in the report that Mechanism C is not even referenced under Charter Question #7.
By staff and the leadership team even including Mechanism A and B here, it implies that these are the two mechanisms preferred for further assessment.
I do not believe that is generally supported by the majority of the members of the CCWG-AP.
We haven't yet "rated" the three mechanisms, but we have primarily discussed only two in the recent discussions -- and that does not include Mechanism B.
So, I don't see what the justification is for excluding Mechanism C here OR,
these two paragraphs should be edited out and just keep the new text.
I am sure no one means to reflect a preference here, and possibly this is just unfortunate.
However, think about it: if the "rating" we are doing selects A and C, and then the staff/leadership draft in the next paragraph shows preference for A and B, it gives a very confusing message to the community, to the Board, and to the SO/ACs.
------------------------------ *From:* Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> *Sent:* Friday, August 30, 2019 6:29 PM *To:* ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Subject:* [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - latest version of Final Report by Wednesday 11 September 2019
Dear CCWG,
Please find here for your review the latest version of the Final Report: https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1hWfSYXuhAalh7F_AkkPDuxU7xf-_bNc... <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.goog...>. Attached you will find a redline version that shows you all the updates that have been made since the previous version but as the large number of redlines may be slightly overwhelming, we have posted the clean version for review and comments. Please note the following:
- Text highlighted in blue are those developed by the different small teams and are new compared to the previous version of the report; - Text highlighted in yellow are items that need to be updated after completion of the survey and decision on whether or not to publish for public comment. - Redlines in the attached version are updates in response to comments received on the previous version, clarifications or the result of reorganization of the text because certain recommendations seemed to fit better under a different charter questions.
You are requested to focus your review on any ‘cannot live with items’ that need further discussion or consideration. Of course, if you spot any grammatical errors, inconsistencies or language that could be clarified, please note those as well. As a reminder your input is requested by *Wednesday 11 September 2019* at the latest (see timeline below).
Best regards,
Marika
*Action*
*Expected Timing - By*
Finalize work on items discussed during today’s meeting
Friday 23 August 2019
Staff to integrate agreed to language in draft final report and produce ‘final’ version for review
Friday 30 August 2019
CCWG to review draft final report and flag any issues of major concern
Wednesday 11 September 2019
CCWG Meeting:
- Discuss any major concerns identified - Consider whether a public comment period is desirable
Wednesday 18 September 2019
Launch indicative survey on mechanisms
Friday 20 September 2019
Publish results of indicative survey
Friday 27 September 2019
CCWG members to consult with respective groups
Friday 11 October 2019
Re-launch survey on mechanisms
Monday 14 October 2019
Finalize report based on definitive survey results and either publish for public comment or submit to CO
Friday 25 October 2019
ICANN66 session to present Final Report
Wednesday 6 November 2019 – 15.15 – 18.30
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flearn.icann...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgnso.icann....>. *
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Yes, Marika was very quick to respond. Thanks very much though, for your follow up as well. ________________________________ From: Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 4:24 AM To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>; ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - latest version of Final Report by Wednesday 11 September 2019 Marilyn - this was simply a mistake. In my exchanges with staff it was all correct, we had worked on a Google doc but then we decided to have the mechanism part of the text finalized after our survey ... it must have happened then. Thank you, Erika On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:49 PM Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com>> wrote: Thanks for sending the present DRAFT Final Report. I will spend time reading the full report in more detail, having only skimmed it now, at 6 am my time. However, I have an immediate serious issue with page 14 and 15. We have spent the last several weeks discussing Mechanism A and Mechanism C. Almost no time even mentioning Mechanism B. Yet, I see in the report that Mechanism C is not even referenced under Charter Question #7. By staff and the leadership team even including Mechanism A and B here, it implies that these are the two mechanisms preferred for further assessment. I do not believe that is generally supported by the majority of the members of the CCWG-AP. We haven't yet "rated" the three mechanisms, but we have primarily discussed only two in the recent discussions -- and that does not include Mechanism B. So, I don't see what the justification is for excluding Mechanism C here OR, these two paragraphs should be edited out and just keep the new text. I am sure no one means to reflect a preference here, and possibly this is just unfortunate. However, think about it: if the "rating" we are doing selects A and C, and then the staff/leadership draft in the next paragraph shows preference for A and B, it gives a very confusing message to the community, to the Board, and to the SO/ACs. ________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 6:29 PM To: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - latest version of Final Report by Wednesday 11 September 2019 Dear CCWG, Please find here for your review the latest version of the Final Report: https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1hWfSYXuhAalh7F_AkkPDuxU7xf-_bNcR/view?usp=sharing<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Fa%2Ficann.org%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1hWfSYXuhAalh7F_AkkPDuxU7xf-_bNcR%2Fview%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7C%7C22511313e173408e2c7608d72f7f1ef2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637030095331800284&sdata=2td1AfF%2B02Xs6uvXds31r7%2FJpvChkGrA1EfGo1ozaWA%3D&reserved=0>. Attached you will find a redline version that shows you all the updates that have been made since the previous version but as the large number of redlines may be slightly overwhelming, we have posted the clean version for review and comments. Please note the following: * Text highlighted in blue are those developed by the different small teams and are new compared to the previous version of the report; * Text highlighted in yellow are items that need to be updated after completion of the survey and decision on whether or not to publish for public comment. * Redlines in the attached version are updates in response to comments received on the previous version, clarifications or the result of reorganization of the text because certain recommendations seemed to fit better under a different charter questions. You are requested to focus your review on any ‘cannot live with items’ that need further discussion or consideration. Of course, if you spot any grammatical errors, inconsistencies or language that could be clarified, please note those as well. As a reminder your input is requested by Wednesday 11 September 2019 at the latest (see timeline below). Best regards, Marika Action Expected Timing - By Finalize work on items discussed during today’s meeting Friday 23 August 2019 Staff to integrate agreed to language in draft final report and produce ‘final’ version for review Friday 30 August 2019 CCWG to review draft final report and flag any issues of major concern Wednesday 11 September 2019 CCWG Meeting: * Discuss any major concerns identified * Consider whether a public comment period is desirable Wednesday 18 September 2019 Launch indicative survey on mechanisms Friday 20 September 2019 Publish results of indicative survey Friday 27 September 2019 CCWG members to consult with respective groups Friday 11 October 2019 Re-launch survey on mechanisms Monday 14 October 2019 Finalize report based on definitive survey results and either publish for public comment or submit to CO Friday 25 October 2019 ICANN66 session to present Final Report Wednesday 6 November 2019 – 15.15 – 18.30 Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flearn.icann...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgnso.icann....>. _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7C22511313e173408e2c7608d72f7f1ef2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637030095331840319&sdata=UttcfHQcRqExK7qCam8SyrwsfJ7V2xZSUoSM5Y7ECC8%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Fpolicy&data=02%7C01%7C%7C22511313e173408e2c7608d72f7f1ef2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637030095331850324&sdata=PMXSwoKtMOEIAF9iAVe6e%2Bzt8V3Fj1pMtsw2QHCiIZY%3D&reserved=0>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Ftos&data=02%7C01%7C%7C22511313e173408e2c7608d72f7f1ef2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637030095331860334&sdata=3WQJmMhiLMey8H32D07fK6s6j5hQhXxYiS9yTR9Xevw%3D&reserved=0>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I’m glad you noticed this so quickly, Marilyn. These kind of things can create quickly misunderstandings. Erika Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 2, 2019, at 1:08 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yes, Marika was very quick to respond. Thanks very much though, for your follow up as well.
From: Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 4:24 AM To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>; ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - latest version of Final Report by Wednesday 11 September 2019
Marilyn -
this was simply a mistake. In my exchanges with staff it was all correct, we had worked on a Google doc but then we decided to have the mechanism part of the text finalized after our survey ... it must have happened then.
Thank you, Erika
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:49 PM Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> wrote: Thanks for sending the present DRAFT Final Report.
I will spend time reading the full report in more detail, having only skimmed it now, at 6 am my time.
However, I have an immediate serious issue with page 14 and 15.
We have spent the last several weeks discussing Mechanism A and Mechanism C. Almost no time even mentioning Mechanism B. Yet, I see in the report that Mechanism C is not even referenced under Charter Question #7.
By staff and the leadership team even including Mechanism A and B here, it implies that these are the two mechanisms preferred for further assessment.
I do not believe that is generally supported by the majority of the members of the CCWG-AP.
We haven't yet "rated" the three mechanisms, but we have primarily discussed only two in the recent discussions -- and that does not include Mechanism B.
So, I don't see what the justification is for excluding Mechanism C here OR,
these two paragraphs should be edited out and just keep the new text.
I am sure no one means to reflect a preference here, and possibly this is just unfortunate.
However, think about it: if the "rating" we are doing selects A and C, and then the staff/leadership draft in the next paragraph shows preference for A and B, it gives a very confusing message to the community, to the Board, and to the SO/ACs.
From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 6:29 PM To: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - latest version of Final Report by Wednesday 11 September 2019
Dear CCWG,
Please find here for your review the latest version of the Final Report: https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1hWfSYXuhAalh7F_AkkPDuxU7xf-_bNc.... Attached you will find a redline version that shows you all the updates that have been made since the previous version but as the large number of redlines may be slightly overwhelming, we have posted the clean version for review and comments. Please note the following:
Text highlighted in blue are those developed by the different small teams and are new compared to the previous version of the report; Text highlighted in yellow are items that need to be updated after completion of the survey and decision on whether or not to publish for public comment. Redlines in the attached version are updates in response to comments received on the previous version, clarifications or the result of reorganization of the text because certain recommendations seemed to fit better under a different charter questions.
You are requested to focus your review on any ‘cannot live with items’ that need further discussion or consideration. Of course, if you spot any grammatical errors, inconsistencies or language that could be clarified, please note those as well. As a reminder your input is requested by Wednesday 11 September 2019 at the latest (see timeline below).
Best regards,
Marika
Action Expected Timing - By Finalize work on items discussed during today’s meeting Friday 23 August 2019 Staff to integrate agreed to language in draft final report and produce ‘final’ version for review Friday 30 August 2019 CCWG to review draft final report and flag any issues of major concern Wednesday 11 September 2019 CCWG Meeting: Discuss any major concerns identified Consider whether a public comment period is desirable Wednesday 18 September 2019 Launch indicative survey on mechanisms Friday 20 September 2019 Publish results of indicative survey Friday 27 September 2019 CCWG members to consult with respective groups Friday 11 October 2019 Re-launch survey on mechanisms Monday 14 October 2019 Finalize report based on definitive survey results and either publish for public comment or submit to CO Friday 25 October 2019 ICANN66 session to present Final Report Wednesday 6 November 2019 – 15.15 – 18.30
Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I see that the members list still has Stephanie as the NCSG-appointed member instead of me. Julf
Correct, we'll be updating the membership list, including attendance once the report is complete so we do not need to keep redoing it after every meeting. Note that the updated membership list and latest attendance records are available on the wiki for those interested: https://community.icann.org/x/FpjDAw and https://community.icann.org/x/GJjDAw. Best regards, Marika On 8/31/19, 06:46, "Ccwg-auctionproceeds on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org on behalf of julf@julf.com> wrote: I see that the members list still has Stephanie as the NCSG-appointed member instead of me. Julf _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_p... ) and the website Terms of Service (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_t... ). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thanks! Julf On 31-08-19 14:57, Marika Konings wrote:
Correct, we'll be updating the membership list, including attendance once the report is complete so we do not need to keep redoing it after every meeting. Note that the updated membership list and latest attendance records are available on the wiki for those interested: https://community.icann.org/x/FpjDAw and https://community.icann.org/x/GJjDAw.
Best regards,
Marika
On 8/31/19, 06:46, "Ccwg-auctionproceeds on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org on behalf of julf@julf.com> wrote:
I see that the members list still has Stephanie as the NCSG-appointed member instead of me.
Julf
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_p... ) and the website Terms of Service (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_t... ). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (4)
-
Erika Mann -
Johan Helsingius -
Marika Konings -
Marilyn Cade